BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30866832)

  • 21. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
    Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: comparison of trial data from clinical study reports with corresponding trial register entries and journal publications.
    Jørgensen L; Gøtzsche PC; Jefferson T
    Syst Rev; 2020 Feb; 9(1):42. PubMed ID: 32106871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.
    Katsura M; Kuriyama A; Tada M; Yamamoto K; Furukawa TA
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017411. PubMed ID: 28827269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their published protocols: differences occurred frequently but were seldom explained.
    Koensgen N; Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 110():34-41. PubMed ID: 30822507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-date.
    Rombey T; Doni K; Hoffmann F; Pieper D; Allers K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():60-67. PubMed ID: 31589953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals.
    Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM
    Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adherence to the PRISMA-P 2015 reporting guideline was inadequate in systematic review protocols.
    Frost AD; Hróbjartsson A; Nejstgaard CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 150():179-187. PubMed ID: 35820587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsutsumi Y; Kataoka Y; Tsujimoto H; Yamamoto Y; Papola D; Guyatt GH; Fukuhara S; Furukawa TA
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e018856. PubMed ID: 29061634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study.
    Clark J; Glasziou P; Del Mar C; Bannach-Brown A; Stehlik P; Scott AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():81-90. PubMed ID: 32004673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry.
    Dos Santos MBF; Agostini BA; Bassani R; Pereira GKR; Sarkis-Onofre R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):57. PubMed ID: 32160871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A study of the value of requesting information from drug manufacturers for systematic reviews; 9 years of experience from the drug effectiveness review project.
    McDonagh MS; Thakurta S; Peterson K
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):172. PubMed ID: 30348228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsujimoto H; Kataoka Y; Kimachi M; Shimizu S; Ikenoue T; Fukuma S; Yamamoto Y; Fukuhara S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():54-60. PubMed ID: 28242481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019.
    Hoffmann F; Allers K; Rombey T; Helbach J; Hoffmann A; Mathes T; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():1-11. PubMed ID: 34091022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An assessment of the extent to which the contents of PROSPERO records meet the systematic review protocol reporting items in PRISMA-P.
    Booth A; Mitchell AS; Mott A; James S; Cockayne S; Gascoyne S; McDaid C
    F1000Res; 2020; 9():773. PubMed ID: 32850123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Synthesising conceptual frameworks for patient and public involvement in research - a critical appraisal of a meta-narrative review.
    Evans D; Hopewell-Kelly N; Kok M; White J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):116. PubMed ID: 30359226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012-2016: protocol for a systematic review.
    Pieper D; Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Büchter RB; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):73. PubMed ID: 28388960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Page MJ; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Sampson M; Tricco AC; Catalá-López F; Li L; Reid EK; Sarkis-Onofre R; Moher D
    PLoS Med; 2016 May; 13(5):e1002028. PubMed ID: 27218655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.