These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30866832)

  • 41. What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis.
    Herber OR; Bradbury-Jones C; Böling S; Combes S; Hirt J; Koop Y; Nyhagen R; Veldhuizen JD; Taylor J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):122. PubMed ID: 32423388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
    Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
    J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsutsumi Y; Kataoka Y; Tsujimoto H; Yamamoto Y; Papola D; Guyatt GH; Fukuhara S; Furukawa TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():25-34. PubMed ID: 31276781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Rethlefsen ML; Schroter S; Bouter LM; Moher D; Ayala AP; Kirkham JJ; Zeegers MP
    Trials; 2021 Nov; 22(1):791. PubMed ID: 34763714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources.
    Hartling L; Shave K; Thomson D; Fernandes RM; Wingert A; Williams K
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; 5(1):104. PubMed ID: 27328935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials.
    Chauvin A; Moher D; Altman D; Schriger DL; Alam S; Hopewell S; Shanahan DR; Recchioni A; Ravaud P; Boutron I
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e017462. PubMed ID: 28918414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Viguera-Guerra I; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Montilla A; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Gómez-Arias PJ; Vélez García-Nieto A; Gómez-Garcia F; Isla-Tejera B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211919. PubMed ID: 30811451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting.
    Page MJ; Shamseer L; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 7(1):32. PubMed ID: 29463298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto H; Tsujimoto Y; Kataoka Y
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Dec; 10(1):703. PubMed ID: 29208054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific publishing: a systematic review.
    Kern-Goldberger AR; James R; Berghella V; Miller ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 227(1):43-50.e4. PubMed ID: 35120887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Community engagement in research in sub-Saharan Africa: approaches, barriers, facilitators, ethical considerations and the role of gender - a systematic review protocol.
    Akondeng C; Njamnshi WY; Mandi HE; Agbor VN; Bain LE; Njamnshi AK
    BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e057922. PubMed ID: 35545398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A systematic review of the quality of distal radius systematic reviews: Methodology and reporting assessment.
    Belloti JC; Okamura A; Scheeren J; Faloppa F; Ynoe de Moraes V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0206895. PubMed ID: 30673700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Quotation Accuracy of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols on Acupuncture.
    Morán JM; Romero-Moreno M; Santillán-García A; Herrera-Peco I
    Healthcare (Basel); 2021 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 35052219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessment of the abstract reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analysis: a literature survey.
    Jia PL; Xu B; Cheng JM; Huang XH; Kwong JSW; Liu Y; Zhang C; Han Y; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):148. PubMed ID: 31307388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Conference abstracts describing systematic reviews on pain were selectively published, not reliable, and poorly reported.
    Saric L; Dosenovic S; Saldanha IJ; Jelicic Kadic A; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():1-8. PubMed ID: 31533073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.