163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30868350)
1. Can narrowing of the mandibular canal on pre-operative panoramic radiography predict close anatomical contact of the mandibular canal with the mandibular third molar? A meta-analysis.
Liye Q; Zhongwei Z; Xiaojuan S; Min W; Pingping L; Kun C
Oral Radiol; 2020 Apr; 36(2):121-128. PubMed ID: 30868350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of panoramic radiography in predicting inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third molar extraction: a meta-analysis.
Liu W; Yin W; Zhang R; Li J; Zheng Y
Aust Dent J; 2015 Jun; 60(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 25988336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining relationship between inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar.
Atieh MA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 20006158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do anatomical variations of the mandibular canal pose an increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar removal?
Vranckx M; Geerinckx H; Gaêta-Araujo H; Leite AF; Politis C; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):931-937. PubMed ID: 34279700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive Value of Panoramic Radiography for Injury of Inferior Alveolar Nerve After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.
Su N; van Wijk A; Berkhout E; Sanderink G; De Lange J; Wang H; van der Heijden GJMG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 75(4):663-679. PubMed ID: 28041843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of the Computed Tomographic Scan and Panoramic Radiography Before Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Surgery.
Luo Q; Diao W; Luo L; Zhang Y
Med Sci Monit; 2018 May; 24():3340-3347. PubMed ID: 29781451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography.
Nakagawa Y; Ishii H; Nomura Y; Watanabe NY; Hoshiba D; Kobayashi K; Ishibashi K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7):1303-8. PubMed ID: 17577493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of panoramic radiography to predict postsurgical sensory impairment following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Huang CK; Lui MT; Cheng DH
J Chin Med Assoc; 2015 Oct; 78(10):617-22. PubMed ID: 26041067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital versus conventional panoramic radiography in predicting inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third molar removal.
Szalma J; Lempel E; Jeges S; Olasz L
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 23(2):e155-8. PubMed ID: 22446455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic proximity of the mandibular third molar to the inferior alveolar canal.
Miloro M; DaBell J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 16243238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of orthopantomography and computed tomography image for assessing the relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and mandibular canal.
Katakam SK; Shankar U; Thakur D; Reddy TP; Hari KR; Janga D
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):819-23. PubMed ID: 23404009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inferior alveolar nerve injury and surgical difficulty prediction in third molar surgery: the role of dental panoramic tomography.
Jerjes W; El-Maaytah M; Swinson B; Upile T; Thompson G; Gittelmon S; Baldwin D; Hadi H; Vourvachis M; Abizadeh N; Al Khawalde M; Hopper C
J Clin Dent; 2006; 17(5):122-30. PubMed ID: 17240930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Bifid and trifid mandibular canal. A coincidental finding].
Mizbah K; Gerlach N; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Meijer GJ
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2010 Dec; 117(12):616-8. PubMed ID: 21298889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical assessment of the relationship between the third molar and the inferior alveolar canal using panoramic images and computed tomography.
Nakamori K; Fujiwara K; Miyazaki A; Tomihara K; Tsuji M; Nakai M; Michifuri Y; Suzuki R; Komai K; Shimanishi M; Hiratsuka H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 66(11):2308-13. PubMed ID: 18940497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
Ishak MH; Zhun OC; Shaari R; Rahman SA; Hasan MN; Alam MK
Mymensingh Med J; 2014 Oct; 23(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 25481601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction.
Maegawa H; Sano K; Kitagawa Y; Ogasawara T; Miyauchi K; Sekine J; Inokuchi T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 14600702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.
Monaco G; Montevecchi M; Bonetti GA; Gatto MR; Checchi L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Mar; 135(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 15058618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons.
Koong B; Pharoah MJ; Bulsara M; Tennant M
Aust Dent J; 2006 Mar; 51(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 16669480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation.
Patel PS; Shah JS; Dudhia BB; Butala PB; Jani YV; Macwan RS
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 32246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
