BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30868546)

  • 1. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
    Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
    Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
    Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer with liver metastasis: a comparison with open surgery.
    Li J; Xi H; Cui J; Zhang K; Gao Y; Liang W; Cai A; Wei B; Chen L
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 29075971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
    Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
    Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
    Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive versus open intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11001. PubMed ID: 34040037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
    Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The short-term outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: comparison with open and laparoscopic surgery using a propensity score analysis.
    Ishihara S; Kiyomatsu T; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Hata K; Kazama S; Sunami E; Nozawa H; Watanabe T
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 29687373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):721-728. PubMed ID: 26092002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The minimally invasive approach, laparoscopic and robotic, in rectal resection for cancer. A single center experience.
    Popescu I; Vasilescu C; Tomulescu V; Vasile S; Sgarbura O
    Acta Chir Iugosl; 2010; 57(3):29-35. PubMed ID: 21066980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?
    Bayraktar O; Aytaç E; Özben V; Atasoy D; Bilgin İA; Erenler Bayraktar İ; Baca B; Hamzaoğlu İ; Karahasanoğlu T
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2018 Feb; 28(1):e8-e11. PubMed ID: 29252933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
    Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
    Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
    Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.
    Melich G; Hong YK; Kim J; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Sender Liberman A; Min BS
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 25030474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.