394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30868546)
21. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.
Melich G; Hong YK; Kim J; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Sender Liberman A; Min BS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 25030474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution.
Oh SY; Kwon S; Lee KG; Suh YS; Choe HN; Kong SH; Lee HJ; Kim WH; Yang HK
Surg Endosc; 2014 Mar; 28(3):789-95. PubMed ID: 24263458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: Open, Laparoscopic or Robotic Approach.
Gavrila D; Bitere O; Droc G; Lacatus M; Minciuna C; Ilie V; Trandafir B; Herlea V; Tudor S; Vasilescu C
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2021 Oct; 116(5):573-582. PubMed ID: 34749853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival.
Lee L; Wong-Chong N; Kelly JJ; Nassif GJ; Albert MR; Monson JRT
Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):460-470. PubMed ID: 29967992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improved oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive left pancreatectomy: Propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Watson MD; Baimas-George MR; Thompson KJ; Iannitti DA; Ocuin LM; Baker EH; Martinie JB; Vrochides D
J Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 122(7):1383-1392. PubMed ID: 32772366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors.
Wong AP; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Wong RH; Harvey MJ; Lam S; Koski TR; Fessler RG
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11. PubMed ID: 26235009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.
Hellan M; Ouellette J; Lagares-Garcia JA; Rauh SM; Kennedy HL; Nicholson JD; Nesbitt D; Johnson CS; Pigazzi A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):2151-8. PubMed ID: 25487966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Considering Value in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of Costs and Outcomes Based on the Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approach for Proctectomy.
Silva-Velazco J; Dietz DW; Stocchi L; Costedio M; Gorgun E; Kalady MF; Kessler H; Lavery IC; Remzi FH
Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):960-968. PubMed ID: 27232247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older.
Kwon IG; Cho I; Guner A; Kim HI; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2321-30. PubMed ID: 25480603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Real-world comparison of curative open, laparoscopic and robotic resections for sigmoid and rectal cancer-single center experience.
Ansari SA; Javed MA; Hedayat F; Harris C; Gill M; Sheikh A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):315-321. PubMed ID: 33871771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.
Horsey ML; Parascandola SA; Sparks AD; Hota S; Ng M; Obias V
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33638109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Excision of Rectal Neoplasia: Clinical Experience With 58 Consecutive Patients.
Tomassi MJ; Taller J; Yuhan R; Ruan JH; Klaristenfeld DD
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 Mar; 62(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 30451744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Systematic review analysis of robotic and transanal approaches in TME surgery- A systematic review of the current literature in regard to challenges in rectal cancer surgery.
Grass JK; Perez DR; Izbicki JR; Reeh M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 30470529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Open versus minimally invasive sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study in Peru.
Guevara-Jabiles A; Berrospi F; Chávez I; Luque-Vásquez C; Payet E; Baldeon D; Caparachín N; Ruiz E
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2022; 42(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 35896071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.
Wei D; Johnston S; Goldstein L; Nagle D
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):610-621. PubMed ID: 31089882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
