These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction? Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence. Rothschild J; Chang Kit L; Seltz L; Wang L; Kaufman M; Dmochowski R; Milam DF J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 23820053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Urethral lumen occlusion by artificial sphincteric devices: a computational biomechanics approach. Natali AN; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG; Todros S; De Benedictis GM; Cerruto MA; Artibani W Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Aug; 16(4):1439-1446. PubMed ID: 28343260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of urethral atrophy after implantation of artificial urinary sphincter: what are the weaknesses? Heah NH; Tan RBW Asian J Androl; 2020; 22(1):60-63. PubMed ID: 31736473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement. Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In silico assessment of the reliability and performance of artificial sphincter for urinary incontinence. Mascolini MV; Carniel EL Artif Organs; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38895983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical failure rates of artificial urinary sphincter components: Is the 3.5-cm urethral cuff at higher risk? Loh-Doyle JC; Hartman N; Nazemi A; Wayne K; Doumanian LR; Ginsberg DA; Boyd SD Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Jan; 38(1):187-192. PubMed ID: 30248180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) Reactivation at the Time of Urethral Cuff Exchange is Not Associated with Increased Erosion Rate. Rabinowitz MJ; Haney NM; Liu JL; Dani H; Cohen AJ; Wright EJ Urology; 2021 Nov; 157():253-256. PubMed ID: 34343563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental investigation of the biomechanics of urethral tissues and structures. Natali AN; Carniel EL; Frigo A; Pavan PG; Todros S; Pachera P; Fontanella CG; Rubini A; Cavicchioli L; Avital Y; De Benedictis GM Exp Physiol; 2016 May; 101(5):641-56. PubMed ID: 26864993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proximal artificial sphincter cuff repositioning for urethral atrophy incontinence. Couillard DR; Vapnek JM; Stone AR Urology; 1995 Apr; 45(4):653-6. PubMed ID: 7716847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival. Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is Risk of Artificial Urethral Sphincter Cuff Erosion Higher in Patients with Penile Prosthesis? Sundaram V; Cordon BH; Hofer MD; Morey AF J Sex Med; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1432-1437. PubMed ID: 27555513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy. Zheng DC; Xie MK; Bao JW; Yao HJ; Wang Z J Vis Exp; 2022 Jun; (184):. PubMed ID: 35781527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small intestinal submucosa urethral wrap at the time of artificial urinary sphincter placement as a salvage treatment option for patients with persistent/recurrent incontinence following multiple prior sphincter failures and erosions. Trost L; Elliott D Urology; 2012 Apr; 79(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 22119252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]