BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30869751)

  • 21. A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures.
    Karounis H; Gouin S; Eisman H; Chalut D; Pelletier H; Williams B
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Jul; 11(7):730-5. PubMed ID: 15231459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
    Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
    Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
    Irvin TT; Koffman CG; Duthie HL
    Br J Surg; 1976 Oct; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In Vivo Comparison of MONOFIX, A Novel Barbed Suture with a Triangular Stopper, with Pre-existing Products in a Porcine Model.
    Kim J; Eom HJ; Shin H; Jeong SY; Kim MS; Yoon HS; In CH; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee JW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 30959198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An in vivo comparison of barbed suture devices and conventional monofilament sutures for cosmetic skin closure: biomechanical wound strength and histology.
    Zaruby J; Gingras K; Taylor J; Maul D
    Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Feb; 31(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 21317121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scientific basis for the selection of skin closure techniques.
    Edlich RF; Gubler K; Wallis AG; Clark JJ; Dahlstrom JJ; Long WB
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2010; 29(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 21284598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sutures, needles, and tissue adhesives: a review for dermatologic surgery.
    Yag-Howard C
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Sep; 40 Suppl 9():S3-S15. PubMed ID: 25158874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prevention of incisional hernias: how to close a midline incision.
    Israelsson LA; Millbourn D
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Oct; 93(5):1027-40. PubMed ID: 24035074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Commonly used suture materials in skin surgery.
    Moy RL; Lee A; Zalka A
    Am Fam Physician; 1991 Dec; 44(6):2123-8. PubMed ID: 1746393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tension of knotted surgical sutures shows tissue specific rapid loss in a rodent model.
    Klink CD; Binnebösel M; Alizai HP; Lambertz A; Vontrotha KT; Junker E; Disselhorst-Klug C; Neumann UP; Klinge U
    BMC Surg; 2011 Dec; 11():36. PubMed ID: 22188826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Syneture stainless STEEL suture. A collective review of its performance in surgical wound closure.
    Edlich RF; Drake DB; Rodeheaver GT; Winters KL; Greene JA; Gubler KD; Long WB; Britt LD; Winters SP; Scott CC; Lin KY
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 16566749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Surgical basic skills: surgical sutures].
    Barros M; Gorgal R; Machado AP; Correia A; Montenegro N
    Acta Med Port; 2011 Dec; 24 Suppl 4():1051-6. PubMed ID: 22863517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of suture technique on laparotomy wound healing: an experimental study in the rat.
    Höer J; Klinge U; Schachtrupp A; Töns C; Schumpelick V
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2001 Apr; 386(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 11382325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
    Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
    Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The application of the V-Loc closure device for gastrointestinal sutures: a preliminary study.
    Nemecek E; Negrin L; Beran C; Nemecek R; Hollinsky C
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3830-4. PubMed ID: 23644839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of new absorbable Lactomer subcuticular staple.
    Zachmann GC; Foresman PA; Bill TJ; Bentrem DJ; Rodeheaver GT; Edlich RF
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10147448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic absorbable suture for ophthalmic surgery.
    Dunlap WA; Purnell WD; McPherson SD
    Adv Ophthalmol; 1976; 33():49-61. PubMed ID: 790910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture.
    Sulamanidze M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Jul; 120(1):349-350. PubMed ID: 17572590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Knot integrity using different suture types and different knot-tying techniques for reconstructive pelvic floor procedures.
    Dueñas-Garcia OF; Sullivan GM; Leung K; Billiar KL; Flynn MK
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jul; 29(7):979-985. PubMed ID: 28634623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An innovative method to evaluate the suture compliance in sealing the surgical wound lips.
    Saleh F; Palmieri B; Lodi D; Al-Sebeih K
    Int J Med Sci; 2008; 5(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 19015745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.