These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30869941)
1. Testing a goal-driven account of involuntary attentional capture by threat. Brown CRH; Berggren N; Forster S Emotion; 2020 Jun; 20(4):572-589. PubMed ID: 30869941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Not looking for any trouble? Purely affective attentional settings do not induce goal-driven attentional capture. Brown CRH; Berggren N; Forster S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1150-1165. PubMed ID: 31773510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attentional capture by alcohol-related stimuli may be activated involuntarily by top-down search goals. Brown CRH; Duka T; Forster S Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jul; 235(7):2087-2099. PubMed ID: 29696310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Goal-driven attentional capture by appetitive and aversive smoking-related cues in nicotine-dependent smokers. Brown CRH; Forster S; Duka T Drug Alcohol Depend; 2018 Sep; 190():209-215. PubMed ID: 30055425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Threat captures attention, but not automatically: Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors. Vromen JM; Lipp OV; Remington RW; Becker SI Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2266-79. PubMed ID: 27234013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture. Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The spider does not always win the fight for attention: Disengagement from threat is modulated by goal set. Vromen JM; Lipp OV; Remington RW Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(7):1185-96. PubMed ID: 25329044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The perceptual enhancement by spatial attention is impaired during the attentional blink. Bae E; Jung S; Han SW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():150-158. PubMed ID: 30119048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Capturing attention is not that simple: different mechanisms for stimulus-driven and contingent capture. Liao HI; Yeh SL Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1703-14. PubMed ID: 24037596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An effective attentional set for a specific colour does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors. Retell JD; Becker SI; Remington RW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1340-65. PubMed ID: 26299891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cue frequency modulates cuing effect either in the presence or in the absence of distractors. Yoon Y; Jung S; Jeoung K; Ha SJ; Kim D; Han SW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():73-79. PubMed ID: 30597422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distracted by danger: Temporal and spatial dynamics of visual selection in the presence of threat. Mulckhuyse M; Dalmaijer ES Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):315-24. PubMed ID: 26546018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The time course of the contingent spatial blink. Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16035345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention. Jung K; Han SW; Min Y Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reward and attentional control in visual search. Yantis S; Anderson BA; Wampler EK; Laurent PA Nebr Symp Motiv; 2012; 59():91-116. PubMed ID: 23437631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]