These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30869941)

  • 1. Testing a goal-driven account of involuntary attentional capture by threat.
    Brown CRH; Berggren N; Forster S
    Emotion; 2020 Jun; 20(4):572-589. PubMed ID: 30869941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Not looking for any trouble? Purely affective attentional settings do not induce goal-driven attentional capture.
    Brown CRH; Berggren N; Forster S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1150-1165. PubMed ID: 31773510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional capture by alcohol-related stimuli may be activated involuntarily by top-down search goals.
    Brown CRH; Duka T; Forster S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jul; 235(7):2087-2099. PubMed ID: 29696310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Goal-driven attentional capture by appetitive and aversive smoking-related cues in nicotine-dependent smokers.
    Brown CRH; Forster S; Duka T
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2018 Sep; 190():209-215. PubMed ID: 30055425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Threat captures attention, but not automatically: Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors.
    Vromen JM; Lipp OV; Remington RW; Becker SI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2266-79. PubMed ID: 27234013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The spider does not always win the fight for attention: Disengagement from threat is modulated by goal set.
    Vromen JM; Lipp OV; Remington RW
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(7):1185-96. PubMed ID: 25329044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perceptual enhancement by spatial attention is impaired during the attentional blink.
    Bae E; Jung S; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():150-158. PubMed ID: 30119048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Capturing attention is not that simple: different mechanisms for stimulus-driven and contingent capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1703-14. PubMed ID: 24037596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An effective attentional set for a specific colour does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors.
    Retell JD; Becker SI; Remington RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1340-65. PubMed ID: 26299891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cue frequency modulates cuing effect either in the presence or in the absence of distractors.
    Yoon Y; Jung S; Jeoung K; Ha SJ; Kim D; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():73-79. PubMed ID: 30597422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distracted by danger: Temporal and spatial dynamics of visual selection in the presence of threat.
    Mulckhuyse M; Dalmaijer ES
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):315-24. PubMed ID: 26546018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The time course of the contingent spatial blink.
    Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16035345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reward and attentional control in visual search.
    Yantis S; Anderson BA; Wampler EK; Laurent PA
    Nebr Symp Motiv; 2012; 59():91-116. PubMed ID: 23437631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):415-428. PubMed ID: 27905069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.
    Gibson BS; Kelsey EM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 9627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings.
    Glickman M; Lamy D
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):303-314. PubMed ID: 28281398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Threat reduces value-driven but not salience-driven attentional capture.
    Kim AJ; Anderson BA
    Emotion; 2020 Aug; 20(5):874-889. PubMed ID: 30869945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.