These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30869968)

  • 1. A double error dynamic asymptote model of associative learning.
    Kokkola NH; Mondragón E; Alonso E
    Psychol Rev; 2019 Jul; 126(4):506-549. PubMed ID: 30869968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mediated learning: A computational rendering of ketamine-induced symptoms.
    Mondragón E
    Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 138(3):178-194. PubMed ID: 38635181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learned biases in the processing of outcomes: A brief review of the outcome predictability effect.
    Griffiths O; Livesey E; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 30604992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learned predictiveness models predict opposite attention biases in the inverse base-rate effect.
    Don HJ; Beesley T; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):143-162. PubMed ID: 30869934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of associative history in models of associative learning: a selective review and a hybrid model.
    Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jul; 57(3):193-243. PubMed ID: 15204108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The representation of stimulus conjunction in theories of associative learning: A context-dependent added-elements model.
    George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):185-204. PubMed ID: 32730078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theory protection: Do humans protect existing associative links?
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Blake KL; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 35143242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A configural theory of attention and associative learning.
    George DN; Pearce JM
    Learn Behav; 2012 Sep; 40(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 22926999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional and error-correcting associative mechanisms in classical conditioning.
    Schmajuk N
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 19594285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Associative change in Pavlovian conditioning: A reappraisal.
    Honey RC; Dwyer DM; Iliescu AF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(4):281-294. PubMed ID: 35549396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elaboration of a model of Pavlovian learning and performance: HeiDI.
    Honey RC; Dwyer DM; Iliescu AF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):170-184. PubMed ID: 32730077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Explaining learned predictiveness: Roles of attention and integration of associative structures.
    Rodríguez G; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 30945925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A combination of common and individual error terms is not needed to explain associative changes when cues with different training histories are conditioned in compound: A review of Rescorla's compound test procedure.
    Holmes NM; Chan YY; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 30945928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A neurocomputational model of classical conditioning phenomena: a putative role for the hippocampal region in associative learning.
    Moustafa AA; Myers CE; Gluck MA
    Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1276():180-95. PubMed ID: 19379717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mini-review: Prediction errors, attention and associative learning.
    Holland PC; Schiffino FL
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 May; 131():207-15. PubMed ID: 26948122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ecco: An error correcting comparator theory.
    Ghirlanda S
    Behav Processes; 2018 Sep; 154():36-44. PubMed ID: 29524550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning about things that never happened: A critique and refinement of the Rescorla-Wagner update rule when many outcomes are possible.
    Hollis G
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1415-1430. PubMed ID: 31152383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of hippocampal manipulations on the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response: simulations by an attentional-associative model.
    Schmajuk NA; Moore JW
    Behav Brain Res; 1989 Mar; 32(2):173-89. PubMed ID: 2923660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normalization between stimulus elements in a model of Pavlovian conditioning: showjumping on an elemental horse.
    Thorwart A; Livesey EJ; Harris JA
    Learn Behav; 2012 Sep; 40(3):334-46. PubMed ID: 22927005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling attention in associative learning: two processes or one?
    Le Pelley ME; Haselgrove M; Esber GR
    Learn Behav; 2012 Sep; 40(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 22927002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.