These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30870376)

  • 1. The Obliteration of Noncritical Size Bone Defects With Bone Dust or Bone Replacement Material (Bioactive Glass S53P4).
    Kluge A; Neudert M; Kunert-Keil C; Lailach S; Zahnert T; Kemper M
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Apr; 40(4):e415-e423. PubMed ID: 30870376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. S53P4 bioactive glass scaffolds induce BMP expression and integrative bone formation in a critical-sized diaphysis defect treated with a single-staged induced membrane technique.
    Eriksson E; Björkenheim R; Strömberg G; Ainola M; Uppstu P; Aalto-Setälä L; Leino VM; Hupa L; Pajarinen J; Lindfors NC
    Acta Biomater; 2021 May; 126():463-476. PubMed ID: 33774197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo model for frontal sinus and calvarial bone defect obliteration with bioactive glass S53P4 and hydroxyapatite.
    Peltola MJ; Aitasalo KM; Suonpää JT; Yli-Urpo A; Laippala PJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 May; 58(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 11319739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frontal sinus and skull bone defect obliteration with three synthetic bioactive materials. A comparative study.
    Peltola MJ; Aitasalo KM; Suonpää JT; Yli-Urpo A; Laippala PJ; Forsback AP
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2003 Jul; 66(1):364-72. PubMed ID: 12808596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancement of bone regeneration and graft material resorption using surface-modified bioactive glass in cortical and human maxillary cystic bone defects.
    El-Ghannam A; Amin H; Nasr T; Shama A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 15101588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of enamel matrix derivative on bioactive glass in rat calvarium defects.
    Potijanyakul P; Sattayasansakul W; Pongpanich S; Leepong N; Kintarak S
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 20553173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in evaluation of bioactive glass incorporation with bone.
    Välimäki VV; Moritz N; Yrjans JJ; Dalstra M; Aro HT
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6693-703. PubMed ID: 15941582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repair of critical size defects using bioactive glass seeded with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells.
    Saçak B; Certel F; Akdeniz ZD; Karademir B; Ercan F; Özkan N; Akpinar İN; Çelebiler Ö
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2017 Jul; 105(5):1002-1008. PubMed ID: 26888652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Low-Level Laser on the Healing of Bone Defects Filled with Autogenous Bone or Bioactive Glass: In Vivo Study.
    Moreira GS; Machado Alves PH; Esper LA; Sbrana MC; da Silva Dalben G; Neppelenbroek KH; Fraga de Almeida ALP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):169-174. PubMed ID: 29340351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone healing in critical-size defects treated with bioactive glass/calcium sulfate: a histologic and histometric study in rat calvaria.
    Furlaneto FA; Nagata MJ; Fucini SE; Deliberador TM; Okamoto T; Messora MR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 17298488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilisation of bioactive glass S53P4 inside an induced membrane for severe bone defect with high risk of infection: a multi-center preliminary experience.
    Aurégan JC; Villain B; Glombitza M; Blokhuis T; Heinänen M; Bégué T
    Injury; 2022 Oct; 53 Suppl 2():S13-S19. PubMed ID: 35871084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular biological evaluation of bioactive glass microspheres and adjunct bone morphogenetic protein 2 gene transfer in the enhancement of new bone formation.
    Välimäki VV; Yrjans JJ; Vuorio EI; Aro HT
    Tissue Eng; 2005; 11(3-4):387-94. PubMed ID: 15869418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Nano-sized bioactive glass enhances osteogenesis of critical bone defect in rabbits].
    Gong WY; Liu SQ; Dong YM; Gao XJ; Chen XF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 29483720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of two bioabsorbable barrier membranes on bone regeneration of standardized defects in calvarial bone: a comparative histomorphometric study in pigs.
    Bornstein MM; Heynen G; Bosshardt DD; Buser D
    J Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 80(8):1289-99. PubMed ID: 19656029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 1-year study of osteoinduction in hydroxyapatite-derived biomaterials in an adult sheep model: part II. Bioengineering implants to optimize bone replacement in reconstruction of cranial defects.
    Gosain AK; Riordan PA; Song L; Amarante MT; Kalantarian B; Nagy PG; Wilson CR; Toth JM; McIntyre BL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1155-63; discussion 1164-5. PubMed ID: 15457027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mastoid obliteration and external auditory canal reconstruction using 3D printed bioactive glass S53P4 /polycaprolactone scaffold loaded with bone morphogenetic protein-2: A simulation clinical study in rabbits.
    Yu F; Fan X; Wu H; Ou Y; Zhao X; Chen T; Qian Y; Kang H
    Regen Ther; 2022 Dec; 21():469-476. PubMed ID: 36313396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of FDBA and autogenous bone particles on regeneration of calvaria defects in the rabbit: a pilot study.
    Borie E; Fuentes R; Del Sol M; Oporto G; Engelke W
    Ann Anat; 2011 Oct; 193(5):412-7. PubMed ID: 21802915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guided bone regeneration in calvarial critical size bony defect using a double-layer resorbable collagen membrane covering a xenograft: a histological and histomorphometric study in rats.
    Abou Fadel R; Samarani R; Chakar C
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 22(2):203-213. PubMed ID: 29654386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inlay cranioplasty: an experimental comparison of particulate graft versus bone dust.
    Clune JE; Mulliken JB; Glowacki J; Rogers GF; Arany PR; Kulungowski AM; Greene AK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 20885252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experimental study of repairing skull defect with autogenous cranial bone dust].
    Chen MJ; Zhuang FL; Wang MS; Wang B
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 24(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 18717356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.