These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30870496)

  • 1. A national study of Veterans with major upper limb amputation: Survey methods, participants, and summary findings.
    Resnik L; Ekerholm S; Borgia M; Clark MA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213578. PubMed ID: 30870496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A National Survey of Prosthesis Use in Veterans with Major Upper Limb Amputation: Comparisons by Gender.
    Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Clark MA
    PM R; 2020 Nov; 12(11):1086-1098. PubMed ID: 32103626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Function and Quality of Life of Unilateral Major Upper Limb Amputees: Effect of Prosthesis Use and Type.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Clark M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 101(8):1396-1406. PubMed ID: 32437692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency, severity, and implications of shoulder pain in people with major upper limb amputation who use prostheses: Results of a National Study.
    Webster JB; Webster N; Borgia M; Resnik L
    PM R; 2022 Aug; 14(8):901-912. PubMed ID: 34219397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dexterity, activity performance, disability, quality of life, and independence in upper limb Veteran prosthesis users: a normative study.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Cancio J; Heckman J; Highsmith J; Levy C; Phillips S; Webster J
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(11):2470-2481. PubMed ID: 33073621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of Veterans with upper limb amputation.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Heinemann AW; Clark MA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Apr; 44(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 31960734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amputation Care Quality and Satisfaction With Prosthetic Limb Services: A Longitudinal Study of Veterans With Upper Limb Amputation.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Ekerholm S; Highsmith MJ; Randolph BJ; Webster J; Clark MA
    Fed Pract; 2021 Mar; 38(3):110-120. PubMed ID: 33859462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prosthesis nonuse and discontinuation in United States veterans with major limb amputation: Results of a national survey.
    Webster J; Borgia M; Resnik L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Dec; 47(6):575-585. PubMed ID: 37314319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient Perspectives on Osseointegration: A National Survey of Veterans with Upper Limb Amputation.
    Resnik L; Benz H; Borgia M; Clark MA
    PM R; 2019 Dec; 11(12):1261-1271. PubMed ID: 30784201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency and Severity of Phantom Limb Pain in Veterans with Major Upper Limb Amputation: Results of a National Survey.
    Balakhanlou E; Webster J; Borgia M; Resnik L
    PM R; 2021 Aug; 13(8):827-835. PubMed ID: 32896094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal study of prosthesis use in veterans with upper limb amputation.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Biester S; Clark MA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Feb; 45(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 33834742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilateral transfemoral/transtibial amputations due to battle injuries: a comparison of Vietnam veterans with Iraq and Afghanistan servicemembers.
    Dougherty PJ; McFarland LV; Smith DG; Reiber GE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Oct; 472(10):3010-6. PubMed ID: 24585323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of phantom upper limb mobility encourage phantom-mobility-based prosthesis control.
    Touillet A; Peultier-Celli L; Nicol C; Jarrassé N; Loiret I; Martinet N; Paysant J; De Graaf JB
    Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15459. PubMed ID: 30337602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Upper limb nerve entrapment syndromes in veterans with lower limb amputations.
    Pyo J; Pasquina PF; DeMarco M; Wallach R; Teodorski E; Cooper RA
    PM R; 2010 Jan; 2(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 20129508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alterations in Brain Structural Connectivity After Unilateral Upper-Limb Amputation.
    Guo X; Liu R; Lu J; Wu C; Lyu Y; Wang Z; Xiang J; Pan C; Tong S
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Oct; 27(10):2196-2204. PubMed ID: 31443033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lower-limb amputation and effect of posttraumatic stress disorder on Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient cost trends.
    Bhatnagar V; Richard E; Melcer T; Walker J; Galarneau M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(7):827-38. PubMed ID: 26745304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Prosthetic Limb Sophistication and Amputation Level on Self-reported Mobility and Satisfaction With Mobility.
    Norvell DC; Henderson AW; Morgenroth DC; Halsne BG; Turner AP; Biggs W; Czerniecki JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2024 Jul; 105(7):1338-1345. PubMed ID: 38561145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring Factors Influencing Low Back Pain in People With Nondysvascular Lower Limb Amputation: A National Survey.
    Devan H; Hendrick P; Hale L; Carman A; Dillon MP; Ribeiro DC
    PM R; 2017 Oct; 9(10):949-959. PubMed ID: 28214616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with phantom limb pain: a 31/2-year prospective study.
    Bosmans JC; Geertzen JH; Post WJ; van der Schans CP; Dijkstra PU
    Clin Rehabil; 2010 May; 24(5):444-53. PubMed ID: 20442256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing the self-perceived mobility of active unilateral lower limb amputees assessed with the Prosthetic Mobility Questionnaire: a brief report.
    Morosato F; Gentile C; Di Bernardo A; Gruppioni E; Miccio A
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2023 Mar; 46(1):108-111. PubMed ID: 36728884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.