290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30870581)
1. Evaluation of the Impact of the Linac MLC and Gantry Sag in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Milan T; Grogan G; Ebert MA; Rowshanfarzad P
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):1984-1994. PubMed ID: 30870581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel method for routine quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Wang Q; Dai J; Zhang K
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101712. PubMed ID: 24089902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
Lee B; Jeong S; Chung K; Yoon M; Park HC; Han Y; Jung SH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):101-110. PubMed ID: 31544350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity of a helical diode array dosimeter to Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy delivery errors.
Arumugam S; Xing A; Young T; Holloway L
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 26429384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation.
Hirashima H; Nakamura M; Miyabe Y; Mukumoto N; Ono T; Iramina H; Mizowaki T
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 14(1):62. PubMed ID: 30971273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interplay effect on a 6-MV flattening-filter-free linear accelerator with high dose rate and fast multi-leaf collimator motion treating breast and lung phantoms.
Netherton T; Li Y; Nitsch P; Shaitelman S; Balter P; Gao S; Klopp A; Muruganandham M; Court L
Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2369-2376. PubMed ID: 29611210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a new control system for Elekta accelerators facilitating continuously variable dose rate.
Bertelsen A; Lorenzen EL; Brink C
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4802-10. PubMed ID: 21928653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A generalized inverse planning tool for volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Cao D; Afghan MK; Ye J; Chen F; Shepard DM
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):6725-38. PubMed ID: 19841516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practical implications for the quality assurance of modulated radiation therapy techniques using point detector arrays.
Kantz S; Troeller McDermott A; Söhn M; Reinhardt S; Belka C; Parodi K; Reiner M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):20-31. PubMed ID: 28857409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moving GPU-OpenCL-based Monte Carlo dose calculation toward clinical use: Automatic beam commissioning and source sampling for treatment plan dose calculation.
Tian Z; Li Y; Hassan-Rezaeian N; Jiang SB; Jia X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):69-84. PubMed ID: 28300376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automating linear accelerator quality assurance.
Eckhause T; Al-Hallaq H; Ritter T; DeMarco J; Farrey K; Pawlicki T; Kim GY; Popple R; Sharma V; Perez M; Park S; Booth JT; Thorwarth R; Moran JM
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6074-83. PubMed ID: 26429282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-institutional comparison of simulated treatment delivery errors in ssIMRT, manually planned VMAT and autoplan-VMAT plans for nasopharyngeal radiotherapy.
Pogson EM; Aruguman S; Hansen CR; Currie M; Oborn BM; Blake SJ; Juresic J; Ochoa C; Yakobi J; Haman A; Trtovac A; Carolan M; Holloway L; Thwaites DI
Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():55-66. PubMed ID: 29173921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When and how to treat an IMRT patient on a second accelerator without replanning?
Lin T; Hossain M; Fan J; Ma CC
Med Dosim; 2018 Winter; 43(4):334-343. PubMed ID: 29287919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
