These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30871677)

  • 1. Machine learning models based on the dimensionality reduction of standard automated perimetry data for glaucoma diagnosis.
    Lee SD; Lee JH; Choi YG; You HC; Kang JH; Jun CH
    Artif Intell Med; 2019 Mar; 94():110-116. PubMed ID: 30871677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Spectral Domain OCT and standard automated perimetry.
    Silva FR; Vidotti VG; Cremasco F; Dias M; Gomi ES; Costa VP
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 23929078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing visual field clustering schemes using machine learning classifiers in standard perimetry.
    Boden C; Chan K; Sample PA; Hao J; Lee TW; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Goldbaum MH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 48(12):5582-90. PubMed ID: 18055807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis.
    Chan K; Lee TW; Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Sejnowski TJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):963-74. PubMed ID: 12214886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry.
    Goldbaum MH; Sample PA; Chan K; Williams J; Lee TW; Blumenthal E; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sejnowski T; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):162-9. PubMed ID: 11773027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function.
    Bowd C; Zangwill LM; Berry CC; Blumenthal EZ; Vasile C; Sanchez-Galeana C; Bosworth CF; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Aug; 42(9):1993-2003. PubMed ID: 11481263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
    Hu R; Wang C; Racette L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unsupervised learning with independent component analysis can identify patterns of glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Goldbaum MH
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2005; 103():270-80. PubMed ID: 17057807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting eyes at risk for rapid glaucoma progression based on an initial visual field test using machine learning.
    Shuldiner SR; Boland MV; Ramulu PY; De Moraes CG; Elze T; Myers J; Pasquale L; Wellik S; Yohannan J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249856. PubMed ID: 33861775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting glaucomatous progression in glaucoma suspect eyes using relevance vector machine classifiers for combined structural and functional measurements.
    Bowd C; Lee I; Goldbaum MH; Balasubramanian M; Medeiros FA; Zangwill LM; Girkin CA; Liebmann JM; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 53(4):2382-9. PubMed ID: 22427577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
    Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Features Identified by Unsupervised Machine Learning on Optical Coherence Tomography Scans Predict Glaucoma Progression.
    Christopher M; Belghith A; Weinreb RN; Bowd C; Goldbaum MH; Saunders LJ; Medeiros FA; Zangwill LM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Jun; 59(7):2748-2756. PubMed ID: 29860461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.
    Tafreshi A; Sample PA; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Lalezary M; Racette L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.
    Wang M; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Silva RNE; Bex PJ; Elze T
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Mar; 125(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 29103791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated algorithms combining structure and function outperform general ophthalmologists in diagnosing glaucoma.
    Shigueoka LS; Vasconcellos JPC; Schimiti RB; Reis ASC; Oliveira GO; Gomi ES; Vianna JAR; Lisboa RDDR; Medeiros FA; Costa VP
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207784. PubMed ID: 30517157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.