These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30872047)

  • 1. Keeping track of 'alternative facts': The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections.
    Gordon A; Quadflieg S; Brooks JCW; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jun; 193():46-56. PubMed ID: 30872047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the neural substrates of misinformation processing.
    Gordon A; Brooks JCW; Quadflieg S; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():216-224. PubMed ID: 28987910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural mechanisms of the continued influence effect of misinformation: Analysis based on fMRI causal connectivity.
    Jia L; Jin H; Jin X
    Neurosci Lett; 2024 Jul; 836():137861. PubMed ID: 38849102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
    Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26147670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Warning before misinformation exposure modulates memory encoding.
    Karanian JM; Thomas AK; Race E
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 24(3):440-452. PubMed ID: 38504050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. You don't have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections.
    Ecker UKH; Butler LH; Hamby A
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Dec; 5(1):64. PubMed ID: 33300094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Swire B; Chang D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):570-8. PubMed ID: 21359617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval.
    Karanian JM; Rabb N; Wulff AN; Torrance MG; Thomas AK; Race E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(37):22771-22779. PubMed ID: 32868423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural activity during encoding predicts false memories created by misinformation.
    Okado Y; Stark CE
    Learn Mem; 2005; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15687227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Terrorists brought down the plane!--No, actually it was a technical fault: processing corrections of emotive information.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Apai J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):283-310. PubMed ID: 20694936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.
    Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S; Chadwick M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):41. PubMed ID: 32844338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval.
    Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS
    Memory; 2008 Jan; 16(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 17852727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. fMRI subsequent source memory effects in young, middle-aged and old adults.
    Cansino S; Estrada-Manilla C; Trejo-Morales P; Pasaye-Alcaraz EH; Aguilar-Castañeda E; Salgado-Lujambio P; Sosa-Ortiz AL
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 280():24-35. PubMed ID: 25476566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Encoding negative events under stress: high subjective arousal is related to accurate emotional memory despite misinformation exposure.
    Hoscheidt SM; LaBar KS; Ryan L; Jacobs WJ; Nadel L
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2014 Jul; 112():237-47. PubMed ID: 24055594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality of false memory over time: is memory for misinformation "remembered" or "known"?
    Frost P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 11082861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in susceptibility to misinformation effects and hindsight bias.
    Calvillo DP
    J Gen Psychol; 2014; 141(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25302589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is it smart to read on your phone? The impact of reading format and culture on the continued influence of misinformation.
    Xu Y; Wong R; He S; Veldre A; Andrews S
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1112-1127. PubMed ID: 32430888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Fenton O; Martin K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):292-304. PubMed ID: 24005789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm.
    Higham PA; Blank H; Luna K
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):417-432. PubMed ID: 28816470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.