110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3087318)
1. [Hemodynamic evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis and the Hancock pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position].
Cohen-Solal A; Leroy G; Hittinger L; Fernandez F; Gay J; Gourgon R
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Mar; 79(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 3087318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hemodynamic evaluation of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses.
Levine FH; Carter JE; Buckley MJ; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
Circulation; 1981 Aug; 64(2 Pt 2):II192-5. PubMed ID: 7249322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves.
Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Gill CC; Golding LA; Stewart RW; Loop FD; Williams GW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
Jamieson WR; David TE; Feindel CM; Miyagishima RT; Germann E
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison.
Borger MA; Nette AF; Maganti M; Feindel CM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jun; 83(6):2054-8. PubMed ID: 17532395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro pulsatile flow evaluation of a stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
Sung HW; Le TN; Kingsbury CJ; Quintero LJ; Myers KE; Quijano RC
ASAIO J; 1995; 41(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7727828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch.
Azadani AN; Jaussaud N; Matthews PB; Chuter TA; Ge L; Guy TS; Guccione J; Tseng EE
J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19852139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
Gao G; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Starr A
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in vivo.
Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Williams GW
Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):II146-52. PubMed ID: 4028359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the aortic intact porcine bioprosthesis.
Mullany CJ; Schaff HV; Orszulak TA; Miller FA
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 8000607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Twelve-year experience with the 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve.
Nakajima H; Aupart MR; Neville PH; Sirinelli AL; Meurisse YA; Marchand MA
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 9793853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodynamic evaluation of 23 mm Pericarbon and 23 mm Hancock II bioprostheses in the aortic position at mid-term follow up.
Ius P; Totis O; Chirillo F; Cavarzerani A; Zussa C; Piccoli C; Valfrè C
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 8953444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve: use of microsimulation.
Puvimanasinghe JP; Takkenberg JJ; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW; van Herwerden LA; Grunkemeier GL; Habbema JD; Bogers AJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep; 80(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 16122436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemodynamic function of the Hancock standard orifice aortic valve bioprosthesis.
Borkon AM; McIntosh CL; Jones M; Lipson LC; Kent KM; Morrow AG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Oct; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 7278353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
