These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30874678)

  • 1. Twin-field quantum key distribution with modified coherent states.
    Zhang CH; Zhang CM; Wang Q
    Opt Lett; 2019 Mar; 44(6):1468-1471. PubMed ID: 30874678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sending-or-Not-Sending with Independent Lasers: Secure Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 509 km.
    Chen JP; Zhang C; Liu Y; Jiang C; Zhang W; Hu XL; Guan JY; Yu ZW; Xu H; Lin J; Li MJ; Chen H; Li H; You L; Wang Z; Wang XB; Zhang Q; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Feb; 124(7):070501. PubMed ID: 32142314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Security Analysis of Sending or Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with Weak Randomness.
    Jiang XL; Wang Y; Lu YF; Li JJ; Zhou C; Bao WS
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Sep; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 37420359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with modified coherent state.
    Li M; Zhang CM; Yin ZQ; Chen W; Wang S; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Lett; 2014 Feb; 39(4):880-3. PubMed ID: 24562231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Field Test of Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution through Sending-or-Not-Sending over 428 km.
    Liu H; Jiang C; Zhu HT; Zou M; Yu ZW; Hu XL; Xu H; Ma S; Han Z; Chen JP; Dai Y; Tang SB; Zhang W; Li H; You L; Wang Z; Hua Y; Hu H; Zhang H; Zhou F; Zhang Q; Wang XB; Chen TY; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2021 Jun; 126(25):250502. PubMed ID: 34241519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coherent-State-Based Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution.
    Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):14918. PubMed ID: 31624279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method.
    Xue K; Shen Z; Zhao S; Mao Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with the double-scanning method.
    Chen YP; Liu JY; Sun MS; Zhou XX; Zhang CH; Li J; Wang Q
    Opt Lett; 2021 Aug; 46(15):3729-3732. PubMed ID: 34329267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite-key analysis for twin-field quantum key distribution based on generalized operator dominance condition.
    Wang RQ; Yin ZQ; Lu FY; Wang R; Wang S; Chen W; Huang W; Xu BJ; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Express; 2020 Jul; 28(15):22594-22605. PubMed ID: 32752517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sending-or-not-sending twin-field quantum key distribution in practice.
    Yu ZW; Hu XL; Jiang C; Xu H; Wang XB
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):3080. PubMed ID: 30816159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Passive Light Source Monitoring for Sending or Not Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution.
    Qian X; Zhang C; Yuan H; Zhou X; Li J; Wang Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Apr; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prefixed-Threshold Real-Time Selection for Free-Space Sending-or-Not Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution.
    Yu Y; Xu R; Wang L; Mao Q; Zhao S
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Feb; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 35327855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters.
    Lucamarini M; Yuan ZL; Dynes JF; Shields AJ
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):400-403. PubMed ID: 29720656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with Light Source Monitoring.
    Qiao Y; Chen Z; Zhang Y; Xu B; Guo H
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 33285811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust twin-field quantum key distribution through sending or not sending.
    Jiang C; Yu ZW; Hu XL; Wang XB
    Natl Sci Rev; 2023 Apr; 10(4):nwac186. PubMed ID: 37089191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proof-of-Principle Experimental Demonstration of Twin-Field Type Quantum Key Distribution.
    Zhong X; Hu J; Curty M; Qian L; Lo HK
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Sep; 123(10):100506. PubMed ID: 31573297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement-Device-Independent Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution.
    Yin HL; Fu Y
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):3045. PubMed ID: 30816262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decoy-state phase-matching quantum key distribution with source errors.
    Yu Y; Wang L; Zhao S; Mao Q
    Opt Express; 2021 Jan; 29(2):2227-2243. PubMed ID: 33726422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phase Matching Quantum Key Distribution based on Single-Photon Entanglement.
    Li W; Wang L; Zhao S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15466. PubMed ID: 31664069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-distance measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with coherent-state superpositions.
    Yin HL; Cao WF; Fu Y; Tang YL; Liu Y; Chen TY; Chen ZB
    Opt Lett; 2014 Sep; 39(18):5451-4. PubMed ID: 26466295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.