631 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30874722)
1. Anatomic Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes and Aesthetic Results Compared to Smooth Round Silicone Implants.
Agochukwu-Nwubah N; Boustany A; Wetzel M; Maus J; Rinker B
Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jul; 39(8):NP322-NP330. PubMed ID: 30874722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tradeoffs in Implant Selection for Reconstructive Surgery and Adjuncts Utilized to Maximize Aesthetic Outcomes.
Unger JG; Keller PR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):51S-59S. PubMed ID: 31246761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes Utilizing Inspira Implants in Revisionary Reconstructive Surgery.
Sigalove S; Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):66S-72S. PubMed ID: 31246763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ten-year Core Study Data for Sientra's Food and Drug Administration-Approved Round and Shaped Breast Implants with Cohesive Silicone Gel.
Stevens WG; Calobrace MB; Alizadeh K; Zeidler KR; Harrington JL; d'Incelli RC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):7S-19S. PubMed ID: 29595714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk Factor Analysis for Capsular Contracture: A 10-Year Sientra Study Using Round, Smooth, and Textured Implants for Breast Augmentation.
Calobrace MB; Stevens WG; Capizzi PJ; Cohen R; Godinez T; Beckstrand M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):20S-28S. PubMed ID: 29595715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes Utilizing Inspira Implants in Primary Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Warren Peled A; Disa JJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):60S-65S. PubMed ID: 31246762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indications for the use of MemoryShape breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: long-term clinical outcomes of shaped versus round silicone breast implants.
Caplin DA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Sep; 134(3 Suppl):27S-37S. PubMed ID: 25158767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smooth versus Textured Implant Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
Vorstenbosch J; McCarthy CM; Shamsunder MG; Polanco TO; Dabic S; Wiser I; Matros E; Dayan J; Disa JJ; Pusic AL; Cavalli MR; Encarnacion E; Lee M; Mehrara BJ; Nelson JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 148(5):959-967. PubMed ID: 34705770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Implant Type on Nipple Position Geometry and Aesthetics Following Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy.
Dorfman RG; Mioton L; Stone E; Yan W; Qiu C; Marla S; Kim JY
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 May; 38(6):605-613. PubMed ID: 29267860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive Comparison Between Shaped Versus Round Implants for Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Han SE; Lee KT; Bang S
Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Jan; 41(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 32449906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of the use of silicone implants in breast surgery.
Chao AH; Garza R; Povoski SP
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016; 13(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 26690709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nine-Year Core Study Data for Sientra's FDA-Approved Round and Shaped Implants with High-Strength Cohesive Silicone Gel.
Stevens WG; Calobrace MB; Harrington J; Alizadeh K; Zeidler KR; d'Incelli RC
Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 26961987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eight-Year Safety Data for Round and Anatomical Silicone Gel Breast Implants.
Duteille F; Perrot P; Bacheley MH; Stewart S
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 29040345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0.
Antony AK; Robinson EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 31033812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Round gel breast implants or anatomic gel breast implants: which is the best choice?
Cárdenas-Camarena L; Encinas-Brambila J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):743-51. PubMed ID: 19484175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Silicone breast prostheses: A cohort study of complaints, complications, and explantations between 2003 and 2015.
Pool SMW; Wolthuizen R; Mouës-Vink CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Nov; 71(11):1563-1569. PubMed ID: 30172729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years.
Maxwell GP; Van Natta BW; Murphy DK; Slicton A; Bengtson BP
Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Aug; 32(6):709-17. PubMed ID: 22751081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Introduction to "Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery".
Gabriel A; Maxwell GP; Disa J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):5S-6S. PubMed ID: 31246754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
