446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30874847)
21. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the surgical diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.
Yamaguchi K; Chijiwa K; Shimizu S; Yokohata K; Morisaki T; Tanaka M
Am J Surg; 1998 Mar; 175(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9560120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Highly resolved free-breathing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnostic workup of pancreaticobiliary diseases in infants and young children--initial experiences.
Schaefer JF; Kirschner HJ; Lichy M; Schlemmer HP; Schick F; Claussen CD; Fuchs J
J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Oct; 41(10):1645-51. PubMed ID: 17011262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pancreaticobiliary diseases. Comparison of 2D single-shot turbo spin-echo MR cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Arslan A; Geitung JT; Viktil E; Abdelnoor M; Osnes M
Acta Radiol; 2000 Nov; 41(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 11092486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.
Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS
Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pancreatic duct evaluation: accuracy of portal venous phase 64 MDCT.
Anderson SW; Soto JA
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 18425544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients suspicious for pancreatobiliary diseases].
Chang YJ; Kim JS; Kim HS; Kim MG; Lee JY; Seo YS; Kim CH; Kim JY; Yeon JE; Park JJ; Byun KS; Bak YT; Lee CH
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 47(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 16632983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation.
Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kamata N
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16680507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Navigator-triggered isotropic three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstructions: comparison with direct cholangiography.
Choi JY; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SH; Lee MW; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 18050328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of MRCP and ERCP in the evaluation of common bile duct and pancreatic duct pathologies.
Kumar A; Mohanty NR; Mohanty M; Dash S
Front Med Technol; 2023; 5():946555. PubMed ID: 37521722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of biliary duct narrowing and choledocholithiasis: accuracy of portal venous phase multidetector CT.
Anderson SW; Rho E; Soto JA
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):418-27. PubMed ID: 18372450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis.
Sica GT; Braver J; Cooney MJ; Miller FH; Chai JL; Adams DF
Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 10207456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in identifying pancreatic duct disruption.
Drake LM; Anis M; Lawrence C
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Sep; 46(8):696-9. PubMed ID: 22565603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in malignant pancreaticobiliary obstruction.
Georgopoulos SK; Schwartz LH; Jarnagin WR; Gerdes H; Breite I; Fong Y; Blumgart LH; Kurtz RC
Arch Surg; 1999 Sep; 134(9):1002-7. PubMed ID: 10487597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Magnetic resonance tomography of biliary and pancreatic ducts].
Tennøe B; Stiris MG; Dullerud R; Lunde OC; Aadland E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(22):3252-6. PubMed ID: 10533404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Administration of secretin (RG1068) increases the sensitivity of detection of duct abnormalities by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis.
Sherman S; Freeman ML; Tarnasky PR; Wilcox CM; Kulkarni A; Aisen AM; Jacoby D; Kozarek RA
Gastroenterology; 2014 Sep; 147(3):646-654.e2. PubMed ID: 24906040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.
Griffin N; Wastle ML; Dunn WK; Ryder SD; Beckingham IJ
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Jul; 15(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 12811312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnostic evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis.
Park SH; Kim MH; Kim SY; Kim HJ; Moon SH; Lee SS; Byun JH; Lee SK; Seo DW; Lee MG
Pancreas; 2010 Nov; 39(8):1191-8. PubMed ID: 20467343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Zhong L; Xiao SD; Stoker J; Nj Tytgat G
Chin J Dig Dis; 2004; 5(4):139-48. PubMed ID: 15612882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Kaltenthaler E; Vergel YB; Chilcott J; Thomas S; Blakeborough T; Walters SJ; Bouchier H
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Mar; 8(10):iii, 1-89. PubMed ID: 14982656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
