These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30875313)
1. Influence of depth of mesio-occlusodistal preparation and mechanical cycling on fracture resistance of restored premolars. Sábio S; de Moraes Melo Neto CL; Mondelli J; Atta MT Gen Dent; 2019; 67(2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 30875313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin. Soares PV; Santos-Filho PCF; Queiroz EC; Araújo TC; Campos RE; Araújo CA; Soares CJ J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 17971112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of two types of composite fibers on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an in vitro study. Oskoee PA; Chaharom ME; Kimyai S; Oskoee JS; Varasteh S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22186687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques. Santos MJ; Bezerra RB J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin. Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study. Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations. Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of different cusp coverage restorations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Serin Kalay T; Yildirim T; Ulker M J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):404-10. PubMed ID: 27086106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses. Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars. Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II composite restorations. Reel DC; Mitchell RJ J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 2654362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage. Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]