These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30875663)

  • 1. Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Blaisdell KN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():236-242. PubMed ID: 30875663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jul; 324():110823. PubMed ID: 34004529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1740-1757. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S; Hong A; Mejia R
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jan; 63(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 36631175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Latent print comparison and examiner conclusions: A field analysis of case processing in one crime laboratory.
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Neuman M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Feb; 319():110642. PubMed ID: 33338673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
    Curley LJ; Munro J; Lages M; MacLean R; Murray J
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):354-360. PubMed ID: 31693180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fillers can help control for contextual bias in forensic comparison tasks.
    Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 30035551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.
    Cooper GS; Meterko V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():35-46. PubMed ID: 30769302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?*
    Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
    He N; Wang L; Hao H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of contextual information in forensic toxicology: An international survey of toxicologists' experiences.
    Hamnett HJ; Jack RE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):380-389. PubMed ID: 31256809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What types of information can and do latent print examiners review? A survey of practicing examiners.
    Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111598. PubMed ID: 36801503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.
    Camilleri A; Abarno D; Bird C; Coxon A; Mitchell N; Redman K; Sly N; Wills S; Silenieks E; Simpson E; Lindsay H
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):533-543. PubMed ID: 31472798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects and benefits of a latent print AFIS deferral policy.
    Hudman R; Hines D; Hilliard S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112047. PubMed ID: 38733654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results.
    Stevenage SV; Bennett A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():93-106. PubMed ID: 28514701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework.
    Quigley-McBride A; Dror IE; Roy T; Garrett BL; Kukucka J
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100216. PubMed ID: 35243284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality.
    Kelley S; Gardner BO; Murrie DC; Pan KDH; Kafadar K
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32111284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.