162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30875663)
1. Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?
Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Blaisdell KN
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():236-242. PubMed ID: 30875663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance.
Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jul; 324():110823. PubMed ID: 34004529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does image editing improve the quality of latent prints? An analysis of image-editing techniques in one crime laboratory.
Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S; Hong A; Mejia R
Sci Justice; 2023 Jan; 63(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 36631175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Latent print comparison and examiner conclusions: A field analysis of case processing in one crime laboratory.
Gardner BO; Kelley S; Neuman M
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Feb; 319():110642. PubMed ID: 33338673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
Curley LJ; Munro J; Lages M; MacLean R; Murray J
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):354-360. PubMed ID: 31693180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fillers can help control for contextual bias in forensic comparison tasks.
Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 30035551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.
Cooper GS; Meterko V
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():35-46. PubMed ID: 30769302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?*
Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
He N; Wang L; Hao H
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of contextual information in forensic toxicology: An international survey of toxicologists' experiences.
Hamnett HJ; Jack RE
Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):380-389. PubMed ID: 31256809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What types of information can and do latent print examiners review? A survey of practicing examiners.
Gardner BO; Neuman M; Kelley S
Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111598. PubMed ID: 36801503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.
Camilleri A; Abarno D; Bird C; Coxon A; Mitchell N; Redman K; Sly N; Wills S; Silenieks E; Simpson E; Lindsay H
Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):533-543. PubMed ID: 31472798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38922874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects and benefits of a latent print AFIS deferral policy.
Hudman R; Hines D; Hilliard S
Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112047. PubMed ID: 38733654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results.
Stevenage SV; Bennett A
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():93-106. PubMed ID: 28514701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework.
Quigley-McBride A; Dror IE; Roy T; Garrett BL; Kukucka J
Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100216. PubMed ID: 35243284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality.
Kelley S; Gardner BO; Murrie DC; Pan KDH; Kafadar K
Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32111284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
