669 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30875864)
21. Metagenomics reveals niche partitioning within the phototrophic zone of a microbial mat.
Lee JZ; Everroad RC; Karaoz U; Detweiler AM; Pett-Ridge J; Weber PK; Prufert-Bebout L; Bebout BM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202792. PubMed ID: 30204767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bioinformatics for NGS-based metagenomics and the application to biogas research.
Jünemann S; Kleinbölting N; Jaenicke S; Henke C; Hassa J; Nelkner J; Stolze Y; Albaum SP; Schlüter A; Goesmann A; Sczyrba A; Stoye J
J Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 261():10-23. PubMed ID: 28823476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Moleculo Long-Read Sequencing Facilitates Assembly and Genomic Binning from Complex Soil Metagenomes.
White RA; Bottos EM; Roy Chowdhury T; Zucker JD; Brislawn CJ; Nicora CD; Fansler SJ; Glaesemann KR; Glass K; Jansson JK
mSystems; 2016; 1(3):. PubMed ID: 27822530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Metagenomic assembly through the lens of validation: recent advances in assessing and improving the quality of genomes assembled from metagenomes.
Olson ND; Treangen TJ; Hill CM; Cepeda-Espinoza V; Ghurye J; Koren S; Pop M
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1140-1150. PubMed ID: 28968737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Challenges of next-generation sequencing targeting anaerobes.
Conrads G; Abdelbary MMH
Anaerobe; 2019 Aug; 58():47-52. PubMed ID: 30769104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. RIEMS: a software pipeline for sensitive and comprehensive taxonomic classification of reads from metagenomics datasets.
Scheuch M; Höper D; Beer M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):69. PubMed ID: 25886935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. From Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing to Viral Community Profiling: The ViromeScan Tool.
Rampelli S; Turroni S
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1746():181-185. PubMed ID: 29492895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Metagenomics Approaches for Improving Food Safety: A Review.
Billington C; Kingsbury JM; Rivas L
J Food Prot; 2022 Mar; 85(3):448-464. PubMed ID: 34706052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. metaBIT, an integrative and automated metagenomic pipeline for analysing microbial profiles from high-throughput sequencing shotgun data.
Louvel G; Der Sarkissian C; Hanghøj K; Orlando L
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Nov; 16(6):1415-1427. PubMed ID: 27238636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Exploring Semi-Quantitative Metagenomic Studies Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing: A Computational and Experimental Protocol.
Alili R; Belda E; Le P; Wirth T; Zucker JD; Prifti E; Clément K
Genes (Basel); 2021 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 34680891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Strainberry: automated strain separation in low-complexity metagenomes using long reads.
Vicedomini R; Quince C; Darling AE; Chikhi R
Nat Commun; 2021 Jul; 12(1):4485. PubMed ID: 34301928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Metagenome Assembly and Contig Assignment.
Zhang Q
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():179-192. PubMed ID: 30298255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. High definition for systems biology of microbial communities: metagenomics gets genome-centric and strain-resolved.
Turaev D; Rattei T
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2016 Jun; 39():174-181. PubMed ID: 27115497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. PanFP: pangenome-based functional profiles for microbial communities.
Jun SR; Robeson MS; Hauser LJ; Schadt CW; Gorin AA
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():479. PubMed ID: 26409790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Unveiling the role of emerging metagenomics for the examination of hypersaline environments.
Dindhoria K; Manyapu V; Ali A; Kumar R
Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev; 2023 Apr; ():1-39. PubMed ID: 37017219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CAMISIM: simulating metagenomes and microbial communities.
Fritz A; Hofmann P; Majda S; Dahms E; Dröge J; Fiedler J; Lesker TR; Belmann P; DeMaere MZ; Darling AE; Sczyrba A; Bremges A; McHardy AC
Microbiome; 2019 Feb; 7(1):17. PubMed ID: 30736849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Metagenomic tools in microbial ecology research.
Taş N; de Jong AE; Li Y; Trubl G; Xue Y; Dove NC
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2021 Feb; 67():184-191. PubMed ID: 33592536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Practical evaluation of 11 de novo assemblers in metagenome assembly.
Forouzan E; Shariati P; Mousavi Maleki MS; Karkhane AA; Yakhchali B
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Aug; 151():99-105. PubMed ID: 29953874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Application of computational approaches to analyze metagenomic data.
Gwak HJ; Lee SJ; Rho M
J Microbiol; 2021 Mar; 59(3):233-241. PubMed ID: 33565054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Metaviz: interactive statistical and visual analysis of metagenomic data.
Wagner J; Chelaru F; Kancherla J; Paulson JN; Zhang A; Felix V; Mahurkar A; Elmqvist N; Corrada Bravo H
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Apr; 46(6):2777-2787. PubMed ID: 29529268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
