These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30877467)

  • 1. X-ray examination dose surveys: how accurate are my results?
    Taylor S; Van Muylem A; Howarth N; Gevenois PA; Tack D
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5307-5313. PubMed ID: 30877467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variabilities in X-ray diagnostic reference levels.
    Vanaudenhove T; Van Muylem A; Howarth N; Gevenois PA; Tack D
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4641-4647. PubMed ID: 32270316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT diagnostic reference levels: are they appropriately computed?
    Vanaudenhove T; Van Muylem A; Howarth N; Gevenois PA; Tack D
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5264-5271. PubMed ID: 30963277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Reference Levels for conventional radiography and fluoroscopy in Austria: Results and updated National Diagnostic Reference Levels derived from a nationwide survey.
    Wachabauer D; Röthlin F; Moshammer HM; Homolka P
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():135-139. PubMed ID: 30927937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT dose survey in adults: what sample size for what precision?
    Taylor S; Van Muylem A; Howarth N; Gevenois PA; Tack D
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Jan; 27(1):365-373. PubMed ID: 27048530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 30289498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards the establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for abdomen, KUB, and lumbar spine x-ray examinations in Sri Lanka: a multi-centric study.
    Welarathna S; Velautham S; Sarasanandarajah S
    J Radiol Prot; 2024 Apr; 44(2):. PubMed ID: 38537259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survey of patient doses from conventional diagnostic radiographic examinations in Syria.
    Kharita MH; Khedr MS; Wannus KM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 20332131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Body build and radiation exposure in static roentgen studies (I): A contribution for determining a national reference dose value. Promoted by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (St.Sch 4163)].
    Golder W; Weiner G
    Rofo; 2001 Jun; 173(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 11471299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suggested diagnostic reference levels for paediatric X-ray examinations in India.
    Sonawane AU; Sunil Kumar JV; Singh M; Pradhan AS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 21147790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
    Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local reference dose evaluation in conventional radiography examinations in Iran.
    Shirin Shandiz M; Bahreyni Toosi MT; Farsi S; Yaghobi K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4550. PubMed ID: 24710442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local clinical diagnostic reference levels for chest and abdomen CT examinations in adults as a function of body mass index and clinical indication: a prospective multicenter study.
    Brat H; Zanca F; Montandon S; Racine D; Rizk B; Meicher E; Fournier D
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6794-6804. PubMed ID: 31144074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of dose-area product of common radiographic examinations towards establishing a preliminary diagnostic reference levels (PDRLs) in Southwestern Nigeria.
    Jibiri NN; Olowookere CJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):392-404. PubMed ID: 27929511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regional survey of entrance surface dose to patients from X-ray examinations in Saudi Arabia.
    Saeed MK
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Jun; 38(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 25801149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of patients' organ doses and conceptus doses from selected X-ray examinations in two Nigeria X-ray centres.
    Ogundare FO; Olarinoye IO; Obed RI
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 19129203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY UTILISING BMI CLASSIFICATION.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):155-167. PubMed ID: 30452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey of dose area product received by patients undergoing common radiological examinations in four centers in Nigeria.
    Akinlade BI; Farai IP; Okunade AA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 13(4):3712. PubMed ID: 22766942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How accurate is size-specific dose estimate in pediatric body CT examinations?
    Karmazyn B; Ai H; Klahr P; Ouyang F; Jennings SG
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Aug; 46(9):1234-40. PubMed ID: 27053280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of patient doses and diagnostic reference levels in X-ray radiography in Lithuania.
    Ziliukas J; Krynke L; Urboniene A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):313-6. PubMed ID: 20211916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.