318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30877499)
21. Identifying Factors and Techniques to Decrease the Positive Margin Rate in Partial Mastectomies: Have We Missed the Mark?
Edwards SB; Leitman IM; Wengrofsky AJ; Giddins MJ; Harris E; Mills CB; Fukuhara S; Cassaro S
Breast J; 2016 May; 22(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 26854189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
Chagpar AB; Killelea BK; Tsangaris TN; Butler M; Stavris K; Li F; Yao X; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Horowitz NR
N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 26028131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does three-dimensional intraoperative specimen imaging reduce the need for re-excision in breast cancer patients? A prospective cohort study.
Chagpar AB; Butler M; Killelea BK; Horowitz NR; Stavris K; Lannin DR
Am J Surg; 2015 Nov; 210(5):886-90. PubMed ID: 26255230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients.
Lepomäki M; Karhunen-Enckell U; Tuominen J; Kronqvist P; Oksala N; Murtola T; Roine A
J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):577-588. PubMed ID: 34779520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intraoperative radiological margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery.
Ihrai T; Quaranta D; Fouche Y; Machiavello JC; Raoust I; Chapellier C; Maestro C; Marcy M; Ferrero JM; Flipo B
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 24468296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of intra-operative margin management techniques in breast-conserving surgery: a standardised approach reduces the likelihood of residual disease without increasing operative time.
Bolger JC; Solon JG; Khan SA; Hill AD; Power CP
Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 23649303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography?
Amer HA; Schmitzberger F; Ingold-Heppner B; Kussmaul J; El Tohamy MF; Tantawy HI; Hamm B; Makowski M; Fallenberg EM
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():258-264. PubMed ID: 28668424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Feasibility Study of a Novel Protease-Activated Fluorescent Imaging System for Real-Time, Intraoperative Detection of Residual Breast Cancer in Breast Conserving Surgery.
Smith BL; Lanahan CR; Specht MC; Kelly BN; Brown C; Strasfeld DB; Ferrer JM; Rai U; Tang R; Rice-Stitt T; Biernacka A; Brachtel EF; Gadd MA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):1854-1861. PubMed ID: 31898104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Single institution's randomized double-armed prospective study of lumpectomy margins with adjunctive use of the MarginProbe in nonpalpable breast cancers.
Geha RC; Taback B; Cadena L; Borden B; Feldman S
Breast J; 2020 Nov; 26(11):2157-2162. PubMed ID: 32772474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer.
Ramos M; Díaz JC; Ramos T; Ruano R; Aparicio M; Sancho M; González-Orús JM
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 23110817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rapid virtual hematoxylin and eosin histology of breast tissue specimens using a compact fluorescence nonlinear microscope.
Cahill LC; Giacomelli MG; Yoshitake T; Vardeh H; Faulkner-Jones BE; Connolly JL; Sun CK; Fujimoto JG
Lab Invest; 2018 Jan; 98(1):150-160. PubMed ID: 29131161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A novel modality for intraoperative margin assessment and its impact on re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.
Kupstas A; Ibrar W; Hayward RD; Ockner D; Wesen C; Falk J
Am J Surg; 2018 Mar; 215(3):400-403. PubMed ID: 29191356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers.
Fisher CS; Mushawah FA; Cyr AE; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 21861232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Ruthazer R; DiPetrillo T; Boyle T; Kanski J; Safaii H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 10571194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Standardized pathologic examination of breast excision specimen. Relevance within an interdisciplinary practice protocol for quality management of breast saving therapy].
Decker T; Ruhnke M; Schneider W
Pathologe; 1997 Jan; 18(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 9157405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of Using Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guided Breast- Conserving Surgery on Positive Margin and Re-Excision Rates in Breast Cancer Cases with Current SSO/ASTRO Guidelines.
Thanasitthichai S; Chaiwerawattana A; Phadhana-Anake O
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4463-4467. PubMed ID: 27797262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of specimen US for predicting resection margin status in breast conserving therapy.
Moschetta M; Telegrafo M; Introna T; Coi L; Rella L; Ranieri V; Cirili A; Stabile Ianora AA; Angelelli G
G Chir; 2015; 36(5):201-4. PubMed ID: 26712255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
