136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30877578)
1. Interactive effects between donor and recipient species mediate fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt in a co-flowering community.
Arceo-Gómez G; Kaczorowski RL; Patel C; Ashman TL
Oecologia; 2019 Apr; 189(4):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 30877578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward a predictive understanding of the fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt and its importance in co-flowering communities.
Ashman TL; Arceo-Gómez G
Am J Bot; 2013 Jun; 100(6):1061-70. PubMed ID: 23624924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Causes and consequences of variation in heterospecific pollen receipt in Oenothera fruticosa.
Smith GX; Swartz MT; Spigler RB
Am J Bot; 2021 Sep; 108(9):1612-1624. PubMed ID: 34460097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of heterospecific pollen on stigma behavior in Campsis radicans: Causes and consequences.
Zou TT; Wang CH; Lyu ST; Yu X; Deng LX; Liu WQ; Dai J; Wang XF
Am J Bot; 2022 Jun; 109(6):1004-1015. PubMed ID: 35567497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patterns of among- and within-species variation in heterospecific pollen receipt: The importance of ecological generalization.
Arceo-Gómez G; Abdala-Roberts L; Jankowiak A; Kohler C; Meindl GA; Navarro-Fernández CM; Parra-Tabla V; Ashman TL; Alonso C
Am J Bot; 2016 Mar; 103(3):396-407. PubMed ID: 26507115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma.
Suárez-Mariño A; Arceo-Gómez G; Sosenski P; Parra-Tabla V
Am J Bot; 2019 Oct; 106(10):1308-1315. PubMed ID: 31553505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of heterospecific pollen deposition on pollen tube growth depends on the phylogenetic relatedness between donor and recipient.
Streher NS; Bergamo PJ; Ashman TL; Wolowski M; Sazima M
AoB Plants; 2020 Aug; 12(4):plaa016. PubMed ID: 32665826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pollination success increases with plant diversity in high-Andean communities.
Gavini SS; Sáez A; Tur C; Aizen MA
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22107. PubMed ID: 34764375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial variation of pollen receipt and effects of heterospecific pollen on seed set in
Fang Q; Zhang T; Montgomery BR
Ecol Evol; 2023 Feb; 13(2):e9795. PubMed ID: 36760706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of floral restrictiveness and stigma size on heterospecific pollen receipt in a prairie community.
Montgomery BR; Rathcke BJ
Oecologia; 2012 Feb; 168(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 21833640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A paradoxical mismatch between interspecific pollinator moves and heterospecific pollen receipt in a natural community.
Fang Q; Huang SQ
Ecology; 2016 Aug; 97(8):1970-1978. PubMed ID: 27859194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Negative effects of heterospecific pollen receipt vary with abiotic conditions: ecological and evolutionary implications.
Celaya IN; Arceo-Gómez G; Alonso C; Parra-Tabla V
Ann Bot; 2015 Oct; 116(5):789-95. PubMed ID: 26199385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Water influences how seed production responds to conspecific and heterospecific pollen.
Recart W; Ottoson B; Campbell DR
Am J Bot; 2019 May; 106(5):713-721. PubMed ID: 31002744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre- and post-pollination interaction between six co-flowering Pedicularis species via heterospecific pollen transfer.
Tong ZY; Huang SQ
New Phytol; 2016 Sep; 211(4):1452-61. PubMed ID: 27174497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limited reproductive interference despite high rates of heterospecific pollen transfer among co-occurring bat-pollinated Burmeistera.
Moreira-Hernández JI; Ghai H; Terzich N; Zambrano-Cevallos R; Oleas NH; Muchhala N
Am J Bot; 2023 Jun; 110(6):e16199. PubMed ID: 37318759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is heterospecific pollen receipt the missing link in understanding pollen limitation of plant reproduction?
Ashman TL; Arceo-Gómez G; Bennett JM; Knight TM
Am J Bot; 2020 Jun; 107(6):845-847. PubMed ID: 32445398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of mechanisms of reproductive interference in Taraxacum.
Takemori A; Naiki A; Takakura KI; Kanaoka MM; Nishida S
Ann Bot; 2019 Jun; 123(6):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 30715137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterospecific pollen deposition in Delphinium barbeyi: linking stigmatic pollen loads to reproductive output in the field.
Briggs HM; Anderson LM; Atalla LM; Delva AM; Dobbs EK; Brosi BJ
Ann Bot; 2016 Feb; 117(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 26658101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do Silene species with exposed stigmas tolerate interference by heterospecific pollen?
Hao K; Fang Q; Huang SQ
Am J Bot; 2023 Jun; 110(6):e16147. PubMed ID: 36827179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial variation in the intensity of interactions via heterospecific pollen transfer may contribute to local and global patterns of plant diversity.
Arceo-Gómez G
Ann Bot; 2021 Sep; 128(4):383-394. PubMed ID: 34226913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
