227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30877656)
1. Genotype by environment interaction using AMMI model and estimation of additive and epistasis gene effects for 1000-kernel weight in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).
Bocianowski J; Warzecha T; Nowosad K; Bathelt R
J Appl Genet; 2019 May; 60(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 30877656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mapping and validation of major quantitative trait loci for kernel length in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum).
Zhou H; Liu S; Liu Y; Liu Y; You J; Deng M; Ma J; Chen G; Wei Y; Liu C; Zheng Y
BMC Genet; 2016 Sep; 17(1):130. PubMed ID: 27624070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomewide analysis of epistatic effects for quantitative traits in barley.
Xu S; Jia Z
Genetics; 2007 Apr; 175(4):1955-63. PubMed ID: 17277367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of QTL hot spots for malting quality in two elite breeding lines with distinct tolerance to abiotic stress.
Kochevenko A; Jiang Y; Seiler C; Surdonja K; Kollers S; Reif JC; Korzun V; Graner A
BMC Plant Biol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):106. PubMed ID: 29866039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of QTLs for yield, yield components, and malting quality in a BC3-DH population of spring barley.
Li JZ; Huang XQ; Heinrichs F; Ganal MW; Röder MS
Theor Appl Genet; 2005 Jan; 110(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 15549229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of genetic diversity and yield performance in Jordanian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces grown under Rainfed conditions.
Al-Abdallat AM; Karadsheh A; Hadadd NI; Akash MW; Ceccarelli S; Baum M; Hasan M; Jighly A; Abu Elenein JM
BMC Plant Biol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):191. PubMed ID: 29096621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic analysis of developmental and adaptive traits in three doubled haploid populations of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).
Obsa BT; Eglinton J; Coventry S; March T; Langridge P; Fleury D
Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Jun; 129(6):1139-51. PubMed ID: 26908251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model in QTL mapping for adaptation in barley.
Romagosa I; Ullrich SE; Han F; Hayes PM
Theor Appl Genet; 1996 Jul; 93(1-2):30-7. PubMed ID: 24162195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytical and numerical comparisons of two methods of estimation of additive × additive × additive interaction of QTL effects.
Cyplik A; Bocianowski J
J Appl Genet; 2022 May; 63(2):213-221. PubMed ID: 34940940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QTL mapping for resistance against non-parasitic leaf spots in a spring barley doubled haploid population.
Behn A; Hartl L; Schweizer G; Wenzel G; Baumer M
Theor Appl Genet; 2004 May; 108(7):1229-35. PubMed ID: 14740087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of epistatic interactions between exotic alleles introgressed from wild barley (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum).
von Korff M; Léon J; Pillen K
Theor Appl Genet; 2010 Nov; 121(8):1455-64. PubMed ID: 20617300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interaction of gene effects with environments for malting quality of barley doubled haploids.
Kaczmarek Z; Surma M; Adamski T; Jezowski S; Madajewski R; Krystkowiak K; Kuczyńska A
J Appl Genet; 2002; 43(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 12084968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. QTL mapping uncovers a semi-dwarf 1 (sdw1) allele in the barley (Hordeum vulgare) ND23049 line.
Bélanger S; Paquet-Marceau S; Díaz Lago JE; Belzile F
Genome; 2018 Jun; 61(6):429-436. PubMed ID: 29658311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of epistasis and environment on flowering time in barley reveals a novel flowering-delaying QTL allele.
Afsharyan NP; Sannemann W; Léon J; Ballvora A
J Exp Bot; 2020 Jan; 71(3):893-906. PubMed ID: 31781747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genotype by environment interaction of quantitative traits: a case study in barley.
Zhao F; Xu S
G3 (Bethesda); 2012 Jul; 2(7):779-88. PubMed ID: 22870401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delineation of Genotype X Environment Interaction for Grain Yield in Spring Barley under Untreated and Fungicide-Treated Environments.
Thuraga V; Martinsson UD; Vetukuri RR; Chawade A
Plants (Basel); 2023 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36840063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Epistasis interaction of QTL effects as a genetic parameter influencing estimation of the genetic additive effect.
Bocianowski J
Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Mar; 36(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 23569413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of QTLs for yield and yield components of barley under different growth conditions.
Xue DW; Zhou MX; Zhang XQ; Chen S; Wei K; Zeng FR; Mao Y; Wu FB; Zhang GP
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2010 Mar; 11(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 20205303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploitation of yield stability in barley.
Mühleisen J; Piepho HP; Maurer HP; Zhao Y; Reif JC
Theor Appl Genet; 2014 Sep; 127(9):1949-62. PubMed ID: 25056002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biplot analysis of phenotypic stability in upland cotton genotypes in Mato Grosso.
Farias FJ; Carvalho LP; Silva Filho JL; Teodoro PE
Genet Mol Res; 2016 May; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 27323051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
