These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30880131)

  • 1. Effects of Different Head Positioning Methods on Facial Soft Tissue Analysis Using Stereophotogrammetry.
    Gül Amuk N; Topsakal KG; Baser Keklikci H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 77(6):1277.e1-1277.e10. PubMed ID: 30880131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of mandibular hard and soft tissues in cleft patients.
    Aras I; Baykal D; Bulut M; Dogan S
    J Istanb Univ Fac Dent; 2017; 51(2):14-22. PubMed ID: 28955591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison Of Soft Tissue Chin And Lower Lip Thickness In Adult Patients With Various Mandibular Divergence Patterns.
    Farooq A; Afsar M; Khan VA; Shahnawaz A; Hafeez SD; Shad S; Afsar F
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2023; 35(2):226-230. PubMed ID: 37422810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Correlation between sagittal photogrammetric measurements of the soft tissue profile and dental arches measurements].
    Diouf JS; Touré B; Ndiaye M; Badiane A; Diop-Bâ K; Ngom PI; Diagne F
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Dec; 86(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26655417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue adaptability to hard tissues in facial profiles.
    Kasai K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):674-84. PubMed ID: 9637571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
    Holdaway RA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in the facial soft-tissue profile after mandibular orthognathic surgery.
    Rupperti S; Winterhalder P; Rudzki I; Mast G; Holberg C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1771-1776. PubMed ID: 30173318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal-versus soft-tissue-based cephalometric analyses: is the correlation reproducible?
    Ploder O; Köhnke R; Winsauer H; Götz C; Bissinger O; Haller B; Kolk A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Mar; 77(2):135-141. PubMed ID: 30394163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facial soft tissue changes following maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
    Conley RS; Boyd SB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7):1332-40. PubMed ID: 17577498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in natural head position after orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III patients.
    Cho D; Choi DS; Jang I; Cha BK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 26038079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cephalometric analysis of the soft tissue profile in Hunan Han adults with normal occlusion].
    Zhou S; Ou P; Yu M; Guo X; Shao C; He L; Su H
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Apr; 40(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 25931229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy Turkish young adults: anthropometric measurements.
    Ozdemir ST; Sigirli D; Ercan I; Cankur NS
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 19089493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cone beam tomographic study of facial structures characteristics at rest and wide smile, and their correlation with the facial types.
    Martins LF; Vigorito JW
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):38-44. PubMed ID: 24351148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cephalometric soft tissue analysis of combined elliptical-window genioglossus advancement and hyoid suspension for obstructive sleep apnea.
    Cillo JE; Thakker P; Dattilo DJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 70(3):690-5. PubMed ID: 21684652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the anteroposterior soft-tissue contour of the lower facial third in the ideal young adult.
    Spradley FL; Jacobs JD; Crowe DP
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Mar; 79(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 6938139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft tissue profile changes after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year follow-up.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Sep; 58(9):959-69; discussion 969-70. PubMed ID: 10981975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.