303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30880523)
1. Is it necessary to correct a caesarean scar defect before a subsequent pregnancy? A report of three cases.
Szkodziak P; Stępniak A; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak F; Paszkowski T; Woźniak S
J Int Med Res; 2019 May; 47(5):2248-2255. PubMed ID: 30880523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uterine dehiscence in pregnant with previous caesarean delivery.
Zhu Z; Li H; Zhang J
Ann Med; 2021 Dec; 53(1):1265-1269. PubMed ID: 34309465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Caesarean scar defect: Risk factors and comparison of evaluation efficacy between transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Tang X; Wang J; Du Y; Xie M; Zhang H; Xu H; Hua K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Nov; 242():1-6. PubMed ID: 31520876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of multiparametric MRI in Caesarean section scar characterization and preoperative prediction of scar dehiscence: a prospective study.
Kumar I; Verma A; Matah M; Satpathy G
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jul; 58(7):890-896. PubMed ID: 27799572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect "Isthmocele".
Urman B; Arslan T; Aksu S; Taskiran C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):857-8. PubMed ID: 27006058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Novel laparoscopic surgery for the repair of cesarean scar defect without processing scar resection.
Zhang NN; Wang GW; Zuo N; Yang Q
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Dec; 21(1):815. PubMed ID: 34879840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between ultrasonographic parameters of Cesarean scar defect and outcome of early termination of pregnancy.
Au HK; Liu CF; Tzeng CR; Chien LW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):506-10. PubMed ID: 25865778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Obstetrical outcomes after vaginal repair of caesarean scar diverticula in reproductive-aged women.
Zhou X; Yang X; Chen H; Fang X; Wang X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):407. PubMed ID: 30340551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding.
van der Voet LF; Bij de Vaate AM; Veersema S; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA
BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 24373597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity Of Transabdominal Ultrasound Scan In The Prediction Of Uterine Scar Thickness.
Sarwar I; Akram F; Khan A; Malik S; Islam A; Khan K
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2020; 32(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 32468759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive outcomes following abdominal repair for cesarean scar defect in women who desire subsequent pregnancies: A single-center retrospective study.
Ishikawa H; Saito Y; Koga K; Shozu M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Dec; 291():141-147. PubMed ID: 37871351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cesarean scar defect].
Melo-Cerda I
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2014 Aug; 82(8):530-4. PubMed ID: 25282945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of caesarean scar defect repair in improving postmenstrual bleeding and factors associated with poor effect.
Xu HY; Yang MY; Zhang X; Wang Q; Yi XF; Ding JX; Hua KQ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 37(8):1076-1081. PubMed ID: 28760055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of surgery on subsequent pregnancy outcomes among patients with cesarean scar diverticulum.
Cheng XY; Cheng L; Li WJ; Qian LH; Zhang YQ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 May; 141(2):212-216. PubMed ID: 29341106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis on clinical association of uterine scar diverticulum with subsequent infertility in patients underwent cesarean section.
Bi B; Gao S; Ruan F; Shi Y; Jiang Y; Liu S; Lv W
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Oct; 100(41):e27531. PubMed ID: 34731147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Should Cesarean Scar Defect Be Treated Laparoscopically? A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Api M; Boza A; Gorgen H; Api O
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(7):1145-52. PubMed ID: 26122897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of scar thickness measurements using trans-vaginal sonography and MRI in cases of pregnancy with previous caesarean section. Do they correlate with actual scar thickness?
Singh N; Tripathi R; Mala YM; Dixit R; Tyagi S; Batra A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Nov; 33(8):810-3. PubMed ID: 24219719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery.
Valentin L
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):285-95. PubMed ID: 23103207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphological estimation of incomplete uterine scar rupture (dehiscence) in post- cesarean deliveries. Immunohistochemical studies.
Zietek M; Szczuko M; Celewicz Z
Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(11):685-692. PubMed ID: 33301163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
