167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30881002)
1. Comprehensive evaluation of manikin-based airway training with second generation supraglottic airway devices.
Schmutz A; Bohn E; Spaeth J; Heinrich S
Ther Clin Risk Manag; 2019; 15():367-376. PubMed ID: 30881002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices.
Jackson KM; Cook TM
Anaesthesia; 2007 Apr; 62(4):388-93. PubMed ID: 17381577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.
Kleine-Brueggeney M; Gottfried A; Nabecker S; Greif R; Book M; Theiler L
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28865448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized comparative study of three supraglottic airway devices for controlled ventilation in anesthetized patients.
Sharma M; Sharma B; Gupta M; Panday BC; Sahai C; Sood J
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2022; 38(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 36171925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insertion of four different types of supraglottic airway devices by emergency nurses. A mannequin-based simulation study.
Liti A; Giusti GD; Gili A; Giontella M; Dell'Omo S; Camerlingo V; Fronteddu A; Galazzi A; Bambi S
Acta Biomed; 2020 Nov; 91(12-S):e2020016. PubMed ID: 33263351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparision of Ambu AuraGain™ and LMA
Joshi R; Rudingwa P; Kundra P; Panneerselvam S; Mishra SK
Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Jun; 62(6):455-460. PubMed ID: 29962528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fiberoptic-Guided and Blind Tracheal Intubation Through iLTS-D, Ambu® Auragain™, and I-Gel® Supraglottic Airway Devices: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Trial.
Somri M; Matter I; Gaitini LA; Safadi A; Hawash N; Gómez-Ríos MÁ
J Emerg Med; 2020 Jan; 58(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 31744705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three supraglottic airway devices for airway rescue in the prone position: A manikin-based study.
Gupta B; Gupta S; Hijam B; Shende P; Rewari V
J Emerg Trauma Shock; 2015; 8(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 26604523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Choosing the best supraglottic airway for ophthalmic general anaesthesia: a manikin study.
Seet E; Zhang J; Macachor J; Kumar CM
J Clin Monit Comput; 2021 May; 35(3):443-447. PubMed ID: 32274646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a single-use intubating videoscope (Ambu aScope ™) in three airway training manikins for oral intubation, nasal intubation and intubation via three supraglottic airway devices.
Scutt S; Clark N; Cook TM; Smith C; Christmas T; Coppel L; Crewdson K
Anaesthesia; 2011 Apr; 66(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 21401543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ vs the LMA Supreme™; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Bruppacher HR
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Mar; 63(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 30229857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance and skill retention of five supraglottic airway devices for the pediatric difficult airway in a manikin.
Kulnig J; Füreder L; Harrison N; Frass M; Robak O
Eur J Pediatr; 2018 Jun; 177(6):871-878. PubMed ID: 29619557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of i-gel, LMA-supreme, LMA-classic and LMAproseal as conduits of endotracheal intubation in newborns and infants: A manikin study.
Ankay-Yılbaş A; Başaran B; Üzümcügil F; Akça B; İzgi M; Canbay Ö
Turk J Pediatr; 2019; 61(2):166-173. PubMed ID: 32077644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three supraglottic airway devices for blind tracheal intubation by novice practitioners: A randomized manikin study.
Sonmez O; Colak N; Bayram B; Kara SG; Halac SS
Turk J Emerg Med; 2024; 24(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 38766418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices--a manikin study.
Ruetzler K; Roessler B; Potura L; Priemayr A; Robak O; Schuster E; Frass M
Resuscitation; 2011 May; 82(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 21353364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of blind intubation with different supraglottic airway devices by inexperienced physicians in several airway scenarios: a manikin study.
Bielski A; Smereka J; Madziala M; Golik D; Szarpak L
Eur J Pediatr; 2019 Jun; 178(6):871-882. PubMed ID: 30903306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients.
Shariffuddin II; Teoh WH; Tang E; Hashim N; Loh PS
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2017 Mar; 45(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 28267947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as simulators for inserting the LMA Classic*.
Silsby J; Jordan G; Bayley G; Cook TM
Anaesthesia; 2006 Jun; 61(6):576-9. PubMed ID: 16704593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of three different supraglottic airway devices in simulated difficult airway situations.
Thierbach A; Piepho T; Göbler S; Rützler K; Frass M; Kaye AD; Robak O
Minerva Anestesiol; 2015 Dec; 81(12):1311-7. PubMed ID: 25616207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Air-Q
Portas M; Canal MI; Barrio M; Alonso M; Cabrerizo P; López-Gil M; Zaballos M
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed); 2018 Mar; 65(3):135-142. PubMed ID: 29217156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
