These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30881823)

  • 1. What Is the Most Beautiful Facial Proportion in the 21st Century? Comparative Study among Miss Universe, Miss Universe Thailand, Neoclassical Canons, and Facial Golden Ratios.
    Burusapat C; Lekdaeng P
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e2044. PubMed ID: 30881823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethnic Rhinoplasty in Female Patients: The Neoclassical Canons Revisited.
    Saad A; Hewett S; Nolte M; Delaunay F; Saad M; Cohen SR
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Apr; 42(2):565-576. PubMed ID: 29273934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validity of eight neoclassical facial canons in the Turkish adults.
    Karaca Saygili O; Cinar S; Gulcen B; Ozcan E; Kus I
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2016; 75(4):512-517. PubMed ID: 27830884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults.
    Borman H; Ozgür F; Gürsu G
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Mar; 42(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 10096619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does 3-dimensional facial attractiveness relate to golden ratio, neoclassical canons, 'ideal' ratios and 'ideal' angles?
    Zwahlen RA; Tang ATH; Leung WK; Tan SK
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Sep; 44(1):28. PubMed ID: 36070018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anthropometric facial analysis of the African American woman.
    Porter JP; Olson KL
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2001; 3(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 11497505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neoclassical canons of facial beauty: Do we see the deviations?
    Pavlic A; Trinajstic Zrinski M; Katic V; Spalj S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 45(5):741-747. PubMed ID: 28283341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans.
    Farkas LG; Forrest CR; Litsas L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2000; 24(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 10890944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anthropometric comparison of painting portraits of beautiful women, femme fatales, and artists' mothers.
    Park JY; Hwang SW; Hwang K
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):2110-4. PubMed ID: 24220418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TA; Kolar JC; Munro IR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1985 Mar; 75(3):328-38. PubMed ID: 3883374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neoclassical facial canons in young adults.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; De Bree E; Kau CH; Petousis M; Zacharopoulou I; Kouremenos N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):1693-8. PubMed ID: 23147325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Historical Tools of Anthropometric Facial Assessment: A Systematic Raw Data Analysis on the Applicability of the Neoclassical Canons and Golden Ratio.
    Khoshab N; Donnelly MR; Sayadi LR; Vyas RM; Banyard DA
    Aesthet Surg J; 2022 Jan; 42(1):NP1-NP10. PubMed ID: 34515761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity of three neo-classical facial canons in young adults originating from the Arabian Peninsula.
    Al-Sebaei MO
    Head Face Med; 2015 Mar; 11():4. PubMed ID: 25889948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ideal proportions in full face front view, contemporary versus antique.
    Mommaerts MY; Moerenhout BA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 20542444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria.
    Le TT; Farkas LG; Ngim RC; Levin LS; Forrest CR
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2002; 26(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11891603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional facial analyses of Indian and Malaysian women.
    Kusugal P; Ruttonji Z; Gowda R; Rajpurohit L; Lad P; Ritu
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 26321831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attractive Versus Golden Ratios: Formula of Utopian Beauty through Comparison of Facial Proportions among Worldwide Celebrities and Average People.
    Yalcinkaya E; Kocaman SA; Yuksekkaya M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1950-1955. PubMed ID: 35119402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are neoclassical canons valid for southern Chinese faces?
    Jayaratne YS; Deutsch CK; McGrath CP; Zwahlen RA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52593. PubMed ID: 23285105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis of the facial esthetics of the Miss Korea pageant contestants.
    Jang KS; Bayome M; Park JH; Park KH; Moon HB; Kook YA
    Korean J Orthod; 2017 Mar; 47(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 28337418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.