142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30881936)
1. An Efficient Framework for Accurate Arterial Input Selection in DSC-MRI of Glioma Brain Tumors.
Rahimzadeh H; Fathi Kazerooni A; Deevband MR; Saligheh Rad H
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2019 Feb; 9(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 30881936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging.
Yin J; Sun H; Yang J; Guo Q
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1071-8. PubMed ID: 24753102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Tseng CH; Jaspers J; Romero AM; Wielopolski P; Smits M; van Osch MJP; Vos F
NMR Biomed; 2024 Jan; 37(1):e5038. PubMed ID: 37712359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Arterial input function and gray matter cerebral blood volume measurements in children.
Withey SB; Novak J; MacPherson L; Peet AC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):981-9. PubMed ID: 26514288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A PET-Guided Framework Supports a Multiple Arterial Input Functions Approach in DSC-MRI in Acute Stroke.
Livne M; Madai VI; Brunecker P; Zaro-Weber O; Moeller-Hartmann W; Heiss WD; Mouridsen K; Sobesky J
J Neuroimaging; 2017 Sep; 27(5):486-492. PubMed ID: 28207200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) in longitudinal evaluation of brain metastases.
Starck L; Skeie BS; Bartsch H; Grüner R
Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1166-1174. PubMed ID: 35786055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic arterial input function selection in CT and MR perfusion datasets using deep convolutional neural networks.
Winder A; d'Esterre CD; Menon BK; Fiehler J; Forkert ND
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4199-4211. PubMed ID: 32583617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic determination of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: comparison of different reproducible clustering algorithms.
Yin J; Yang J; Guo Q
Neuroradiology; 2015 May; 57(5):535-43. PubMed ID: 25633539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving the Reliability of Pharmacokinetic Parameters at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Astrocytomas: A Deep Learning Approach.
Choi KS; You SH; Han Y; Ye JC; Jeong B; Choi SH
Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):178-188. PubMed ID: 32749203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic selection of arterial input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.
Peruzzo D; Bertoldo A; Zanderigo F; Cobelli C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Dec; 104(3):e148-57. PubMed ID: 21458099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toward fully automated processing of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI for acute ischemic cerebral stroke.
Kim J; Leira EC; Callison RC; Ludwig B; Moritani T; Magnotta VA; Madsen MT
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 May; 98(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 20060614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic individual arterial input functions calculated from PCA outperform manual and population-averaged approaches for the pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE-MR images.
Sanz-Requena R; Prats-Montalbán JM; Martí-Bonmatí L; Alberich-Bayarri Á; García-Martí G; Pérez R; Ferrer A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):477-87. PubMed ID: 25410482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arterial Input Function (AIF) Correction Using AIF Plus Tissue Inputs with a Bi-LSTM Network.
Huang Q; Le J; Joshi S; Mendes J; Adluru G; DiBella E
Tomography; 2024 Apr; 10(5):660-673. PubMed ID: 38787011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis.
Mouridsen K; Christensen S; Gyldensted L; Ostergaard L
Magn Reson Med; 2006 Mar; 55(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 16453314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of first pass bolus AIFs extracted from sequential
Evans E; Sawiak SJ; Ward AO; Buonincontri G; Hawkes RC; Carpenter TA
Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A; 2014 Jan; 734(B):137-140. PubMed ID: 26213433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
