These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30883151)
1. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts. Colloff MF; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling face similarity in police lineups. Shen KJ; Colloff MF; Vul E; Wilson BM; Wixted JT Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):432-461. PubMed ID: 36548056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of fillers on lineup performance. Wetmore SA; McAdoo RM; Gronlund SD; Neuschatz JS Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):48. PubMed ID: 29214209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison. Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups. Lee J; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models. Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups. Yilmaz AS; Lebensfeld TC; Wilson BM Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 35084905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects. Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups. Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators. Carlson CA; Hemby JA; Wooten AR; Jones AR; Lockamyeir RF; Carlson MA; Dias JL; Whittington JE Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):14. PubMed ID: 33660118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt. Price HL; Bruer KC; Adkins MC Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability. Smith AM; Wells GL; Lindsay RC; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):127-145. PubMed ID: 27685645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments. Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves. Yang Y; Smith AM Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1259-1274. PubMed ID: 35641680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification. Akan M; Robinson MM; Mickes L; Wixted JT; Benjamin AS J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):369-392. PubMed ID: 33271047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]