These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30883151)

  • 21. Providing witnesses with an option to say "I'm not sure" to a showup neither improves classification performance nor the reliability of suspect identifications.
    Jalava ST; Smith AM; Mackovichova S
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 33734750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Active exploration of faces in police lineups increases discrimination accuracy.
    Colloff MF; Flowe HD; Smith HMJ; Seale-Carlisle TM; Meissner CA; Rockey JC; Pande B; Kujur P; Parveen N; Chandel P; Singh MM; Pradhan S; Parganiha A
    Am Psychol; 2022; 77(2):196-220. PubMed ID: 34793182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Memory strength and lineup presentation moderate effects of administrator influence on mistaken identifications.
    Zimmerman DM; Chorn JA; Rhead LM; Evelo AJ; Kovera MB
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):460-473. PubMed ID: 29265857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. sdtlu: An R package for the signal detection analysis of eyewitness lineup data.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):278-300. PubMed ID: 32700238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Designing police lineups to maximize memory performance.
    Seale-Carlisle TM; Wetmore SA; Flowe HD; Mickes L
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):410-430. PubMed ID: 31094561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage.
    Gronlund SD; Carlson CA; Dailey SB; Goodsell CA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Jun; 15(2):140-152. PubMed ID: 19586253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The effect of suggestibility on eyewitness identifications: A comparison between showups and lineups].
    Miura H; Itoh Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2016 Apr; 87(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 27180511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Apr; 121(2):262-76. PubMed ID: 24730600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Eyewitness Identification Is a Visual Search Task.
    Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM
    Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 7():519-541. PubMed ID: 34270349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distinguishing Between Investigator Discriminability and Eyewitness Discriminability: A Method for Creating Full Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of Lineup Identification Performance.
    Smith AM; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 May; 15(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 32375014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage.
    Carlson CA; Gronlund SD; Clark SE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 18590368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A perceptual scaling approach to eyewitness identification.
    Gepshtein S; Wang Y; He F; Diep D; Albright TD
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3380. PubMed ID: 32665586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists.
    Finley JR; Wixted JT; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Aug; 48(6):903-919. PubMed ID: 32222916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence strength (insufficiently) affects police officers' decisions to place a suspect in a lineup.
    Katzman J; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 34968099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. "Only your first yes will count": The impact of prelineup instructions on sequential lineup decisions.
    Horry R; Fitzgerald RJ; Mansour JK
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Mar; 27(1):170-186. PubMed ID: 33119367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.
    Mickes L; Flowe HD; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 23294282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.