BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30883172)

  • 1. Saccadic selection does not eliminate attribute amnesia.
    Born S; Puntiroli M; Jordan D; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2165-2173. PubMed ID: 30883172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Saccadic selection in visual working memory is robust across the visual field and linked to saccade metrics: Evidence from nine experiments and more than 100,000 trials.
    Ohl S; Kroell LM; Rolfs M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Feb; 153(2):544-563. PubMed ID: 38032614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal trans-saccadic integration relies on visual working memory.
    Stewart EEM; Schütz AC
    Vision Res; 2018 Dec; 153():70-81. PubMed ID: 30312623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-related differences in saccadic indices of top-down guidance via short-term memory during visual search.
    Barrett DJK; Hutchinson CV; Zhang F; Xie H; Wang J
    Psychol Aging; 2024 Jun; 39(4):421-435. PubMed ID: 38753407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attribute amnesia as a product of experience-dependent encoding.
    Yan N; Anderson BA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Apr; 31(2):772-780. PubMed ID: 37715060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A common format for representing spatial location in visual and motor working memory.
    Yousif SR; Forrence AD; McDougle SD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Apr; 31(2):697-707. PubMed ID: 37670158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-task costs in working memory: An adversarial collaboration.
    Doherty JM; Belletier C; Rhodes S; Jaroslawska A; Barrouillet P; Camos V; Cowan N; Naveh-Benjamin M; Logie RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1529-1551. PubMed ID: 30407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proactive suppression is an implicit process that cannot be summoned on demand.
    Hauck C; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jun; 50(6):636-653. PubMed ID: 38619486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meaningful objects avoid attribute amnesia due to incidental long-term memories.
    Sasin E; Markov Y; Fougnie D
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14464. PubMed ID: 37660090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition blindness in a saccadic persistence of vision display.
    Nelson R; Shelto E
    Perception; 2024 May; 53(5-6):335-342. PubMed ID: 38483914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Memory compression" effects in visual working memory are contingent on explicit long-term memory.
    Ngiam WXQ; Brissenden JA; Awh E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Aug; 148(8):1373-1385. PubMed ID: 31343232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Build-up of serial dependence in color working memory.
    Barbosa J; Compte A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):10959. PubMed ID: 32616792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel demonstration of preparation in pop-out search.
    Sclodnick B; Sun H; Milliken B
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2024 Jun; 78(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 38330339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic in-flight shifts of working memory resources across saccades.
    Udale R; Tran MT; Manohar S; Husain M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jan; 48(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 35073141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Specifying the precision of guiding features for visual search.
    Alexander RG; Nahvi RJ; Zelinsky GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1248-1264. PubMed ID: 31219282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conceptual information of meaningful objects is stored incidentally.
    Chung YH; Tam J; Wyble B; Störmer VS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38573722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Jointly looking to the past and the future in visual working memory.
    Liu B; Alexopoulou ZS; van Ede F
    Elife; 2024 May; 12():. PubMed ID: 38747572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual similarity judgments do not predict the distribution of errors in working memory.
    Tomić I; Bays PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; 50(4):535-549. PubMed ID: 36442045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of time in binding features in visual working memory.
    Schneegans S; McMaster JMV; Bays PM
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):137-154. PubMed ID: 35099211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surprise! Draw the scene: Visual recall reveals poor incidental working memory following visual search in natural scenes.
    Cárdenas-Miller N; O'Donnell RE; Tam J; Wyble B
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37770695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.