These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30883236)

  • 1. Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.
    Rathi NV; Khatri AA; Agrawal AG; M SB; Thosar NR; Deolia SG
    Anesth Prog; 2019; 66(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30883236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children.
    Mittal M; Sharma S; Kumar A; Chopra R; Srivastava D
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 26883609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Majid OW; Ahmed AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Articaine use does not routinely eliminate the need for palatal injections for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized cross-over clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Maghsoudi N
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 34853915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial.
    Rayati F; Haeri M; Norouziha A; Jabbarian R
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 59(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 34053801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction.
    Bataineh AB; Nusair YM; Al-Rahahleh RQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3239-3248. PubMed ID: 30417227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
    Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Haase A; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Drum M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1228-35. PubMed ID: 18762633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulpal anesthesia of maxillary first molars using 4% articaine infiltration in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Afkhami F; Rostami G; Peters OA; Kamalian F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3999-4006. PubMed ID: 37243822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of single buccal infiltration anesthesia of 4% articaine with either 1:100,000 or 1:200,000 epinephrine on pulpal blood flow and anesthesia of maxillary first molars and second premolars in humans.
    Kijsamanmith K; Sriworapongpun C; Pawasut N; Huayhongthong N; Sakulyuenyong T; Krongyoungyuen P; Samdrup T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):343-351. PubMed ID: 34041607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Articaine versus Lidocaine in only buccal infiltration anesthesia for the extraction of mandibular anterior teeth. A prospective split-mouth randomized-controlled clinical study.
    Al-Mahalawy H; El-Mahallawy Y; Abdelrahman HH; Refahee SM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):604. PubMed ID: 37641122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Efficacy of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Lidocaine in Inducing Palatal Anesthesia for Tooth Extraction in Different Maxillary Regions.
    Gholami M; Banihashemrad A; Mohammadzadeh A; Ahrari F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 79(8):1643-1649. PubMed ID: 33757745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial.
    Massignan C; Silveira Santos P; Cardoso M; Bolan M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 47(8):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 32383196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.
    Luqman U; Majeed Janjua OS; Ashfaq M; Irfan H; Mushtaq S; Bilal A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars.
    Corbett IP; Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2008 May; 34(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18436027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine for the removal of erupted molars.
    Venkat Narayanan J; Gurram P; Krishnan R; Muthusubramanian V; Sadesh Kannan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 21(3):295-299. PubMed ID: 28547078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth.
    Robertson D; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; McCartney M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Aug; 138(8):1104-12. PubMed ID: 17670879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Articaine Versus Lidocaine Concentration in the Palatal Tissues After Supraperiosteal Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia.
    Al-Mahalawy H; Abuohashish H; Chathoth S; Al-Masoud N; Al-Jandan B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 76(2):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 29102601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of buccal infiltration anaesthesia with articaine for extraction of mandibular molars: a clinical trial.
    Rayati F; Noruziha A; Jabbarian R
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):607-610. PubMed ID: 29980352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.