These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30883236)

  • 21. Buffered 4% Articaine as a Primary Buccal Infiltration of the Mandibular First Molar: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study.
    Shurtz R; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Fowler S; Beck M
    J Endod; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1403-7. PubMed ID: 26095381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An in vivo, randomized, controlled comparative evaluation of efficacy, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications of 4% articaine using buccal infiltration and 2% lidocaine using inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular primary molars of children aged 6 to 8 years.
    Khanna SR; Rao D; Panwar S; Ameen S
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Sep; 52(9):780-786. PubMed ID: 34076382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in block and infiltration anesthesia administered in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
    Ashraf H; Kazem M; Dianat O; Noghrehkar F
    J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 23228249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is the only buccal infiltration anesthesia enough for extraction of mandibular anterior incisors and premolar teeth? A split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Ege B; Demirkol M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):3077-3085. PubMed ID: 33051814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Yang F; Gao Y; Zhang L; Zheng B; Wang L; Sun H; Huang D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
    Aggarwal V; Jain A; Kabi D
    J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):925-9. PubMed ID: 19567309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anesthetic Success of an Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Supplemental Articaine Buccal Infiltration for Molars and Premolars in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.
    Fowler S; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):390-2. PubMed ID: 26831048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
    Srinivasan N; Kavitha M; Loganathan CS; Padmini G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19101495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of Buccal Infiltration with Articaine and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block with Lignocaine for Pulp Therapy in Mandibular Primary Molars.
    Chopra R; Marwaha M; Bansal K; Mittal M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 27471808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
    Shapiro MR; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC; Botero TM
    J Endod; 2018 Apr; 44(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 29397214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
    Rogers BS; Botero TM; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 24862701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of Articaine Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia for Mandibular Premolar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Majid OW; Muhammad ZA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 77(9):1784-1789. PubMed ID: 31028737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Preoperative Oral Ketorolac on Anesthetic Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal and Lingual Infiltration with Articaine and Lidocaine in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study.
    Yadav M; Grewal MS; Grewal S; Deshwal P
    J Endod; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1773-7. PubMed ID: 26410153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic.
    Rosenberg PA; Amin KG; Zibari Y; Lin LM
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 17368327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient's pain perception during mandibular molar extraction with articaine: a comparison study between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Bataineh AB; Alwarafi MA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2241-2250. PubMed ID: 26791025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
    Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Visual Analog Scale Scores in Pain Assessment during Pulpotomy using Different Injection Materials in Children Aged 6 to 8 and 8 to 10 Years.
    Alinejhad D; Bahrololoomi Z; Navabazam A; Asayesh MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Mar; 19(3):313-317. PubMed ID: 29603705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.
    Sierra Rebolledo A; Delgado Molina E; Berini Aytís L; Gay Escoda C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Mar; 12(2):E139-44. PubMed ID: 17322803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):296-8. PubMed ID: 16554198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
    Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
    Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.