250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30884215)
1. Assessment of dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI using the sliding window technique.
Savva AD; Mitsis GD; Matsopoulos GK
Brain Behav; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e01255. PubMed ID: 30884215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Wavelet-Based Approach for Estimating Time-Varying Connectivity in Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Savva AD; Matsopoulos GK; Mitsis GD
Brain Connect; 2022 Apr; 12(3):285-298. PubMed ID: 34155908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of motion related outliers in dynamic functional connectivity using the sliding window method.
Savva AD; Kassinopoulos M; Smyrnis N; Matsopoulos GK; Mitsis GD
J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Jan; 330():108519. PubMed ID: 31730872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in resting state fMRI.
Zhang C; Baum SA; Adduru VR; Biswal BB; Michael AM
Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():907-918. PubMed ID: 30120987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI?
Hindriks R; Adhikari MH; Murayama Y; Ganzetti M; Mantini D; Logothetis NK; Deco G
Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():242-256. PubMed ID: 26631813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of different dynamic functional connectivity methods to capture cognitively relevant information.
Xie H; Zheng CY; Handwerker DA; Bandettini PA; Calhoun VD; Mitra S; Gonzalez-Castillo J
Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():502-514. PubMed ID: 30576850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validating dynamicity in resting state fMRI with activation-informed temporal segmentation.
Duda M; Koutra D; Sripada C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Dec; 42(17):5718-5735. PubMed ID: 34510647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in naturalistic paradigm functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Zhang X; Liu J; Yang Y; Zhao S; Guo L; Han J; Hu X
Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Mar; 43(4):1463-1476. PubMed ID: 34870361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nuisance effects and the limitations of nuisance regression in dynamic functional connectivity fMRI.
Nalci A; Rao BD; Liu TT
Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():1005-1031. PubMed ID: 30223062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantifying temporal correlations: a test-retest evaluation of functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI.
Fiecas M; Ombao H; van Lunen D; Baumgartner R; Coimbra A; Feng D
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():231-41. PubMed ID: 23032492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved dynamic connection detection power in estimated dynamic functional connectivity considering multivariate dependencies between brain regions.
Maleki Balajoo S; Asemani D; Khadem A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Oct; 41(15):4264-4287. PubMed ID: 32643845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Altered dynamic functional connectivity in the default mode network in patients with cirrhosis and minimal hepatic encephalopathy.
Chen HJ; Lin HL; Chen QF; Liu PF
Neuroradiology; 2017 Sep; 59(9):905-914. PubMed ID: 28707166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of global signal regression on characterizing dynamic functional connectivity and brain states.
Xu H; Su J; Qin J; Li M; Zeng LL; Hu D; Shen H
Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():127-145. PubMed ID: 29476914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-scale time-dependent window-sizes in sliding-window dynamic functional connectivity analysis: A validation study.
Zhuang X; Yang Z; Mishra V; Sreenivasan K; Bernick C; Cordes D
Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 220():117111. PubMed ID: 32615255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the impact of fast-fMRI on dynamic functional connectivity in an event-based paradigm.
Sahib AK; Erb M; Marquetand J; Martin P; Elshahabi A; Klamer S; Vulliemoz S; Scheffler K; Ethofer T; Focke NK
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190480. PubMed ID: 29357371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic Functional Connectivity Reveals Abnormal Variability and Hyper-connected Pattern in Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Li Y; Zhu Y; Nguchu BA; Wang Y; Wang H; Qiu B; Wang X
Autism Res; 2020 Feb; 13(2):230-243. PubMed ID: 31614075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic thresholding networks for schizophrenia diagnosis.
Zou H; Yang J
Artif Intell Med; 2019 May; 96():25-32. PubMed ID: 31164208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of minimal hepatic encephalopathy based on dynamic functional connectivity.
Cheng Y; Zhang G; Zhang X; Li Y; Li J; Zhou J; Huang L; Xie S; Shen W
Brain Imaging Behav; 2021 Oct; 15(5):2637-2645. PubMed ID: 33755921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.
Liégeois R; Laumann TO; Snyder AZ; Zhou J; Yeo BTT
Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():437-455. PubMed ID: 28916180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutual Information Better Quantifies Brain Network Architecture in Children with Epilepsy.
Zhang W; Muravina V; Azencott R; Chu ZD; Paldino MJ
Comput Math Methods Med; 2018; 2018():6142898. PubMed ID: 30425750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
