138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30884713)
1. Tail or artefact? Illustration of the impact that uncertainty of the serial dilution and cell enumeration methods has on microbial inactivation.
Garre A; Egea JA; Esnoz A; Palop A; Fernandez PS
Food Res Int; 2019 May; 119():76-83. PubMed ID: 30884713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Most Probable Curve method - A robust approach to estimate kinetic models from low plate count data resulting in reduced uncertainty.
Garre A; Zwietering MH; van Boekel MAJS
Int J Food Microbiol; 2022 Nov; 380():109871. PubMed ID: 35985079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Harnessing the theoretical foundations of the exponential and beta-Poisson dose-response models to quantify parameter uncertainty using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
Schmidt PJ; Pintar KD; Fazil AM; Topp E
Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1677-93. PubMed ID: 23311599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stochastic modeling of variability in survival behavior of Bacillus simplex spore population during isothermal inactivation at the single cell level using a Monte Carlo simulation.
Abe H; Koyama K; Kawamura S; Koseki S
Food Microbiol; 2019 Sep; 82():436-444. PubMed ID: 31027803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transforming kinetic model into a stochastic inactivation model: Statistical evaluation of stochastic inactivation of individual cells in a bacterial population.
Hiura S; Abe H; Koyama K; Koseki S
Food Microbiol; 2020 Oct; 91():103508. PubMed ID: 32539982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The Validity of the Poisson Distribution to Analyze Microbial Colony Counts on Agar Plates for Food Samples].
Fujikawa H
Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2023; 64(5):174-178. PubMed ID: 37880096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation method for serial dilution experiments.
Ben-David A; Davidson CE
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Dec; 107():214-21. PubMed ID: 25205541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying uncertainty associated with microbial count data: a Bayesian approach.
Clough HE; Clancy D; O'Neill PD; Robinson SE; French NP
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):610-6. PubMed ID: 16011711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Count data distributions and their zero-modified equivalents as a framework for modelling microbial data with a relatively high occurrence of zero counts.
Gonzales-Barron U; Kerr M; Sheridan JJ; Butler F
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 136(3):268-77. PubMed ID: 19913934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
Augustin JC; Carlier V
Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling Stochastic Variability in the Numbers of Surviving Salmonella enterica, Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes Cells at the Single-Cell Level in a Desiccated Environment.
Koyama K; Hokunan H; Hasegawa M; Kawamura S; Koseki S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of analytical recovery in particle and microorganism enumeration methods.
Schmidt PJ; Emelko MB; Reilly PM
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1705-12. PubMed ID: 20108894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Particle and microorganism enumeration data: enabling quantitative rigor and judicious interpretation.
Emelko MB; Schmidt PJ; Reilly PM
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1720-7. PubMed ID: 20121082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multilevel modelling as a tool to include variability and uncertainty in quantitative microbiology and risk assessment. Thermal inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes as proof of concept.
Garre A; Zwietering MH; den Besten HMW
Food Res Int; 2020 Nov; 137():109374. PubMed ID: 33233076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing the accuracy of the plating method used to enumerate low numbers of viable micro-organisms in food.
Jongenburger I; Reij MW; Boer EP; Gorris LG; Zwietering MH
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Sep; 143(1-2):32-40. PubMed ID: 20724016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement uncertainty evaluation and risk of false conformity assessment for microbial enumeration tests.
Dias FRS; Lourenço FR
J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Oct; 189():106312. PubMed ID: 34428497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A critical review of measurement uncertainty in the enumeration of food micro-organisms.
Corry JE; Jarvis B; Passmore S; Hedges A
Food Microbiol; 2007 May; 24(3):230-53. PubMed ID: 17188202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the use of in-silico simulations to support experimental design: A case study in microbial inactivation of foods.
Garre A; Peñalver-Soto JL; Esnoz A; Iguaz A; Fernandez PS; Egea JA
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220683. PubMed ID: 31454353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uncertainty distribution associated with estimating a proportion in microbial risk assessment.
Miconnet N; Cornu M; Beaufort A; Rosso L; Denis JB
Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15787755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative risk assessment for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef hamburgers.
Cassin MH; Lammerding AM; Todd EC; Ross W; McColl RS
Int J Food Microbiol; 1998 May; 41(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 9631335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
