These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30884713)

  • 21. Fitting a distribution to microbial counts: making sense of zeroes.
    Duarte AS; Stockmarr A; Nauta MJ
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 196():40-50. PubMed ID: 25522056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. QMRA and decision-making: are we handling measurement errors associated with pathogen concentration data correctly?
    Schmidt PJ; Emelko MB
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 20851444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stochastic evaluation of Salmonella enterica lethality during thermal inactivation.
    Abe H; Koyama K; Kawamura S; Koseki S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 285():129-135. PubMed ID: 30118951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The contribution of sampling uncertainty to total measurement uncertainty in the enumeration of microorganisms in foods.
    Jarvis B; Hedges AJ; Corry JE
    Food Microbiol; 2012 Jun; 30(2):362-71. PubMed ID: 22365349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Added value of experts' knowledge to improve a quantitative microbial exposure assessment model--Application to aseptic-UHT food products.
    Pujol L; Johnson NB; Magras C; Albert I; Membré JM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 211():6-17. PubMed ID: 26143288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Second-order modeling of variability and uncertainty in microbial hazard characterization.
    Vicari AS; Mokhtari A; Morales RA; Jaykus LA; Frey HC; Slenning BD; Cowen P
    J Food Prot; 2007 Feb; 70(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 17340870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of environmental parameters (temperature, pH and a(w)) on the individual cell lag phase and generation time of Listeria monocytogenes.
    Francois K; Devlieghere F; Standaert AR; Geeraerd AH; Van Impe JF; Debevere J
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 May; 108(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 16488043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing Monte Carlo error in the Bayesian estimation of risk ratios using log-binomial regression models.
    Salmerón D; Cano JA; Chirlaque MD
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(19):2755-67. PubMed ID: 25944082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating the precision of serial dilutions and viable bacterial counts.
    Hedges AJ
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2002 Jun; 76(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 12051477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Top-down evaluation of the matrix effects in microbial enumeration test uncertainty.
    Dias FRS; Lourenço FR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Apr; 171():105864. PubMed ID: 32044306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Weibullian model for microbial injury and mortality.
    Corradini MG; Peleg M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 119(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 17904675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of food model (micro)structure on the microbial inactivation efficacy of cold atmospheric plasma.
    Smet C; Noriega E; Rosier F; Walsh JL; Valdramidis VP; Van Impe JF
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 240():47-56. PubMed ID: 27507138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian Generalized Linear Model for Simulating Bacterial Inactivation/Growth Considering Variability and Uncertainty.
    Hiura S; Abe H; Koyama K; Koseki S
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():674364. PubMed ID: 34248886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recommendations for the viability assessment of probiotics as concentrated cultures and in food matrices.
    Champagne CP; Ross RP; Saarela M; Hansen KF; Charalampopoulos D
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Oct; 149(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 21803436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do bacterial cell numbers follow a theoretical Poisson distribution? Comparison of experimentally obtained numbers of single cells with random number generation via computer simulation.
    Koyama K; Hokunan H; Hasegawa M; Kawamura S; Koseki S
    Food Microbiol; 2016 Dec; 60():49-53. PubMed ID: 27554145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Matrix Extension Study: Validation of the Compact Dry EC Method for Enumeration of Escherichia coli and non-E. coli Coliform Bacteria in Selected Foods.
    Mizuochi S; Nelson M; Baylis C; Green B; Jewell K; Monadjemi F; Chen Y; Salfinger Y; Fernandez MC
    J AOAC Int; 2016; 99(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 26965216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The COM-Poisson Process for Stochastic Modeling of Osmotic Inactivation Dynamics of
    Polese P; Del Torre M; Stecchini ML
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():681468. PubMed ID: 34305844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating variability and uncertainty separately in microbial quantitative risk assessment using two R packages.
    Pouillot R; Delignette-Muller ML
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Sep; 142(3):330-40. PubMed ID: 20674055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Heterogeneity of single cell inactivation: Assessment of the individual cell time to death and implications in population behavior.
    Aspridou Z; Balomenos A; Tsakanikas P; Manolakos E; Koutsoumanis K
    Food Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 80():85-92. PubMed ID: 30704600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Testing deviation for a set of serial dilution most probable numbers from a Poisson-binomial model.
    Blodgett RJ
    J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 16512243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.