These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30884713)

  • 41. A tutorial on uncertainty propagation techniques for predictive microbiology models: A critical analysis of state-of-the-art techniques.
    Akkermans S; Nimmegeers P; Van Impe JF
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 282():1-8. PubMed ID: 29885972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Measurement uncertainty in microbiology.
    Forster LI
    J AOAC Int; 2003; 86(5):1089-94. PubMed ID: 14632415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Consistent estimation of zero-inflated count models.
    Staub KE; Winkelmann R
    Health Econ; 2013 Jun; 22(6):673-86. PubMed ID: 22623339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Individual cell heterogeneity as variability source in population dynamics of microbial inactivation.
    Aspridou Z; Koutsoumanis KP
    Food Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 45(Pt B):216-21. PubMed ID: 25500387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Propagation of uncertainty in nasal spray in vitro performance models using Monte Carlo simulation: part I. Model prediction using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Guo C; Doub WH; Kauffman JF
    J Pharm Sci; 2010 Apr; 99(4):2114-22. PubMed ID: 19902528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Beta Poisson dose-response model is not a single-hit model.
    Teunis PF; Havelaar AH
    Risk Anal; 2000 Aug; 20(4):513-20. PubMed ID: 11051074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Stochastic simulation for death probability of bacterial population considering variability in individual cell inactivation time and initial number of cells.
    Koyama K; Abe H; Kawamura S; Koseki S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 290():125-131. PubMed ID: 30326383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Stochastically modeling Listeria monocytogenes growth in farm tank milk.
    Albert I; Pouillot R; Denis JB
    Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1171-85. PubMed ID: 16297223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accounting for inherent variability of growth in microbial risk assessment.
    Marks HM; Coleman ME
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 100(1-3):275-87. PubMed ID: 15854712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of measurement uncertainty for quantitative methods of analysis: comparative assessment of the precision (uncertainty) of bacterial colony counts.
    Jarvis B; Hedges AJ; Corry JE
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 May; 116(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17316860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Critical comparison of statistical methods for quantifying variability and uncertainty of microbial responses from experimental data.
    Garre A; Pielaat A; Zwietering MH; den Besten HMW; Smid JH
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2022 Dec; 383():109935. PubMed ID: 36183424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quantitative estimation of sampling uncertainties for mycotoxins in cereal shipments.
    Bourgeois FS; Lyman GJ
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2012; 29(7):1141-56. PubMed ID: 22651820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Topics in microbial risk assessment: dynamic flow tree process.
    Marks HM; Coleman ME; Lin CT; Roberts T
    Risk Anal; 1998 Jun; 18(3):309-28. PubMed ID: 9664727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Performance characteristics and estimation of measurement uncertainty of three plating procedures for Campylobacter enumeration in chicken meat.
    Habib I; Sampers I; Uyttendaele M; Berkvens D; De Zutter L
    Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17993378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing the uncertainty in QUANTEC's dose-response relation of lung and spinal cord with a bootstrap analysis.
    Wedenberg M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 23953634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Modelling homogeneous and heterogeneous microbial contaminations in a powdered food product.
    Jongenburger I; Reij MW; Boer EP; Zwietering MH; Gorris LG
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Jun; 157(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 22591548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Uncertainty and variability in human exposures to soil contaminants through home-grown food: a Monte Carlo assessment.
    McKone TE
    Risk Anal; 1994 Aug; 14(4):449-63. PubMed ID: 7972954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of microbial count distributions on human health risk estimates.
    Duarte AS; Nauta MJ
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 195():48-57. PubMed ID: 25506750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sensitivity analysis of a two-dimensional quantitative microbiological risk assessment: keeping variability and uncertainty separated.
    Busschaert P; Geeraerd AH; Uyttendaele M; Van Impe JF
    Risk Anal; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1295-307. PubMed ID: 21418082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Estimates of measurement uncertainty from proficiency testing schemes, internal laboratory quality monitoring and during routine enforcement examination of foods.
    Jarvis B; Corry JE; Hedges AJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 17650207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.