These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30885281)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of conventional cold curettage versus endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy.
    Bidaye R; Vaid N; Desarda K
    J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):294-299. PubMed ID: 30885281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paediatric adenoidectomy: endoscopic coblation technique compared to cold curettage.
    Di Rienzo Businco L; Angelone AM; Mattei A; Ventura L; Lauriello M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2012 Apr; 32(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 22767975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pediatric Adenoidectomy: A Comparative Study Between Cold Curettage and Coblation Technique.
    Hapalia VB; Panchal AJ; Kumar R; Kapadia PB; Bhiryani MA; Verma RB; Parmar ND
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Oct; 74(Suppl 2):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 36452765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy versus conventional adenoidectomy - a randomised controlled trial.
    Juneja R; Meher R; Raj A; Rathore P; Wadhwa V; Arora N
    J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):289-293. PubMed ID: 31046870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two different adenoidectomy techniques with special emphasize on postoperative nasal mucociliary clearance rates: coblation technique vs. cold curettage.
    Özkiriş M; Karaçavuş S; Kapusuz Z; Saydam L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 77(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 23266160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Endoscope-Assisted Coblation Adenoidectomy to Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy in Terms of Postoperative Eustachian Tube Function.
    Gülşen S; Çikrikçi S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 31(4):919-923. PubMed ID: 31764564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of classical, coblation, and combined adenoidectomy techniques in paediatric patients: a single-blind, prospective study.
    Alaskarov E
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3735-3741. PubMed ID: 38581574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trans-oral endoscopic assisted radio-frequency for adenoid ablation; A randomized prospective comparative clinical study.
    Elzayat S; Elsherif H; Aouf M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Aug; 48(4):710-717. PubMed ID: 33261981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of transoral power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy to curettage adenoidectomy.
    Öztürk Ö; Polat Ş
    Adv Ther; 2012 Aug; 29(8):708-21. PubMed ID: 22864943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic-assisted versus curettage adenoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with objective outcome measures.
    Songu M; Altay C; Adibelli ZH; Adibelli H
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Sep; 120(9):1895-9. PubMed ID: 20715086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How we do it: a combined method of traditional curette and power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy.
    Pagella F; Matti E; Colombo A; Giourgos G; Mira E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 May; 129(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 18720070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of two adenoidectomy technics for efficacy and safety: Conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy.
    Yanılmaz M; Akduman D
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2023; 44(4):103807. PubMed ID: 36906963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrocautery adenoidectomy compared with curettage and power-assisted methods.
    Elluru RG; Johnson L; Myer CM
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Aug; 112(8 Pt 2 Suppl 100):23-5. PubMed ID: 12172234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic nasopharyngeal exploration at the end of conventional curettage adenoidectomy.
    Abdel-Aziz M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 269(3):1037-40. PubMed ID: 21833560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coblation versus microdebrider in pediatric adenoidectomy.
    Mularczyk C; Walner DL; Hamming KK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():29-31. PubMed ID: 29287875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of transnasal and transoral routes of microdebrider combined curettage adenoidectomy and assessment of endoscopy for residue: a randomized prospective study.
    Tulaci KG; Arslan E; Tulaci T; Dinek A; Yazici H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 278(3):797-805. PubMed ID: 32989492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The effect of adenoidectomy in different operative methods on the function of eustachian tube].
    Li Y; Li P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 26(10):466-7. PubMed ID: 22870722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective assessment of endoscopy assisted adenoidectomy.
    Elnashar I; El-Anwar MW; Basha WM; AlShawadfy M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Aug; 78(8):1239-42. PubMed ID: 24930960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy versus conventional curettage adenoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Yang L; Shan Y; Wang S; Cai C; Zhang H
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():426. PubMed ID: 27104114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between curettage adenoidectomy and endoscopic-assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy in terms of Eustachian tube dysfunction.
    Atilla MH; Kaytez SK; Kesici GG; Baştimur S; Tuncer S
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30322828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.