180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30885281)
1. Comparative analysis of conventional cold curettage versus endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy.
Bidaye R; Vaid N; Desarda K
J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):294-299. PubMed ID: 30885281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Paediatric adenoidectomy: endoscopic coblation technique compared to cold curettage.
Di Rienzo Businco L; Angelone AM; Mattei A; Ventura L; Lauriello M
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2012 Apr; 32(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 22767975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pediatric Adenoidectomy: A Comparative Study Between Cold Curettage and Coblation Technique.
Hapalia VB; Panchal AJ; Kumar R; Kapadia PB; Bhiryani MA; Verma RB; Parmar ND
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Oct; 74(Suppl 2):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 36452765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy versus conventional adenoidectomy - a randomised controlled trial.
Juneja R; Meher R; Raj A; Rathore P; Wadhwa V; Arora N
J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):289-293. PubMed ID: 31046870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two different adenoidectomy techniques with special emphasize on postoperative nasal mucociliary clearance rates: coblation technique vs. cold curettage.
Özkiriş M; Karaçavuş S; Kapusuz Z; Saydam L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 77(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 23266160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Endoscope-Assisted Coblation Adenoidectomy to Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy in Terms of Postoperative Eustachian Tube Function.
Gülşen S; Çikrikçi S
J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 31(4):919-923. PubMed ID: 31764564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of classical, coblation, and combined adenoidectomy techniques in paediatric patients: a single-blind, prospective study.
Alaskarov E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3735-3741. PubMed ID: 38581574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trans-oral endoscopic assisted radio-frequency for adenoid ablation; A randomized prospective comparative clinical study.
Elzayat S; Elsherif H; Aouf M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Aug; 48(4):710-717. PubMed ID: 33261981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of transoral power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy to curettage adenoidectomy.
Öztürk Ö; Polat Ş
Adv Ther; 2012 Aug; 29(8):708-21. PubMed ID: 22864943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic-assisted versus curettage adenoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with objective outcome measures.
Songu M; Altay C; Adibelli ZH; Adibelli H
Laryngoscope; 2010 Sep; 120(9):1895-9. PubMed ID: 20715086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How we do it: a combined method of traditional curette and power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy.
Pagella F; Matti E; Colombo A; Giourgos G; Mira E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 May; 129(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 18720070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of two adenoidectomy technics for efficacy and safety: Conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy.
Yanılmaz M; Akduman D
Am J Otolaryngol; 2023; 44(4):103807. PubMed ID: 36906963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrocautery adenoidectomy compared with curettage and power-assisted methods.
Elluru RG; Johnson L; Myer CM
Laryngoscope; 2002 Aug; 112(8 Pt 2 Suppl 100):23-5. PubMed ID: 12172234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic nasopharyngeal exploration at the end of conventional curettage adenoidectomy.
Abdel-Aziz M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 269(3):1037-40. PubMed ID: 21833560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coblation versus microdebrider in pediatric adenoidectomy.
Mularczyk C; Walner DL; Hamming KK
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():29-31. PubMed ID: 29287875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of transnasal and transoral routes of microdebrider combined curettage adenoidectomy and assessment of endoscopy for residue: a randomized prospective study.
Tulaci KG; Arslan E; Tulaci T; Dinek A; Yazici H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 278(3):797-805. PubMed ID: 32989492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The effect of adenoidectomy in different operative methods on the function of eustachian tube].
Li Y; Li P
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 26(10):466-7. PubMed ID: 22870722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective assessment of endoscopy assisted adenoidectomy.
Elnashar I; El-Anwar MW; Basha WM; AlShawadfy M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Aug; 78(8):1239-42. PubMed ID: 24930960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy versus conventional curettage adenoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Yang L; Shan Y; Wang S; Cai C; Zhang H
Springerplus; 2016; 5():426. PubMed ID: 27104114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between curettage adenoidectomy and endoscopic-assisted microdebrider adenoidectomy in terms of Eustachian tube dysfunction.
Atilla MH; Kaytez SK; Kesici GG; Baştimur S; Tuncer S
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30322828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
