479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30885393)
1. Implant cut-out following cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures: Are helical blades to blame?
Ibrahim I; Appleton PT; Wixted JJ; DeAngelis JP; Rodriguez EK
Injury; 2019 Apr; 50(4):926-930. PubMed ID: 30885393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic Review of Helical Blade Versus Lag Screw Fixation for Cephalomedullary Nailing of Low-Energy Peritrochanteric Femur Fractures: There is a Difference in Cutout.
Stern LC; Gorczyca JT; Kates S; Ketz J; Soles G; Humphrey CA
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Jun; 31(6):305-310. PubMed ID: 28346314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ng M; Shah NS; Golub I; Ciminero M; Zhai K; Kang KK; Emara AK; Piuzzi NS
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Dec; 32(8):1617-1625. PubMed ID: 34665292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does Computer-assisted Surgery Improve Lag Screw Placement During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures?
Kuhl M; Beimel C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2132-2144. PubMed ID: 32496321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of failure following fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation.
Raghuraman R; Kam JW; Chua DTC
Singapore Med J; 2019 Sep; 60(9):463-467. PubMed ID: 31570952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalomedullary helical blade is independently associated with less collapse in intertrochanteric femur fractures than lag screws.
Goodnough LH; Wadhwa H; Tigchelaar SS; Pfaff K; Heffner M; Van Rysselberghe N; DeBaun MR; Bishop JA; Gardner MJ
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2021 Oct; 31(7):1421-1425. PubMed ID: 33587180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should the tip-apex distance (TAD) rule be modified for the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)? A retrospective study.
Nikoloski AN; Osbrough AL; Yates PJ
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 8():35. PubMed ID: 24135331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of tip apex distance and cut-out complications between helical blades and lag screws in intertrochanteric fractures among the elderly: a meta-analysis.
Li S; Chang SM; Niu WX; Ma H
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Nov; 20(6):1062-9. PubMed ID: 26481124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Countersinking the Lag Screw or Blade During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: Less Collapse and Implant Prominence Without Increased Cutout Rates.
Henry Goodnough L; Wadhwa H; Tigchelaar SS; Pfaff K; Heffner M; van Rysselberghe N; DeBaun MR; Gardner MJ; Bishop JA
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Jan; 30(1):e83-e90. PubMed ID: 34932507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does an additional antirotation U-Blade (RC) lag screw improve treatment of AO/OTA 31 A1-3 fractures with gamma 3 nail?
Lang NW; Arthold C; Joestl J; Gormasz A; Boesmueller S; Hajdu S; Sarahrudi K
Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2733-2738. PubMed ID: 27832831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures.
Kashigar A; Vincent A; Gunton MJ; Backstein D; Safir O; Kuzyk PR
Bone Joint J; 2014 Aug; 96-B(8):1029-34. PubMed ID: 25086117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Utility of the Tip-Apex Distance in Predicting Axial Migration and Cutout With the Trochanteric Fixation Nail System Helical Blade.
Flores SA; Woolridge A; Caroom C; Jenkins M
J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Jun; 30(6):e207-11. PubMed ID: 26655519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Helical Blade Versus Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Hip Fractures With Cephalomedullary Devices: Incidence of Failure and Atypical "Medial Cutout".
Chapman T; Zmistowski B; Krieg J; Stake S; Jones CM; Levicoff E
J Orthop Trauma; 2018 Aug; 32(8):397-402. PubMed ID: 30035756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.
Buyukdogan K; Caglar O; Isik S; Tokgozoglu M; Atilla B
Injury; 2017 Feb; 48(2):414-418. PubMed ID: 27889112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: a standard or long nail?
Okcu G; Ozkayin N; Okta C; Topcu I; Aktuglu K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Sep; 471(9):2768-75. PubMed ID: 23564362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screws in patients with trochanteric femur fractures: are rotation control lag screws better than others?
Yoo J; Kim S; Choi J; Hwang J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Dec; 14(1):440. PubMed ID: 31842911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of shortening in operatively treated proximal femur fractures with cephalomedullary nails with dynamically versus statistically locked helical blades.
Cherian N; Oladeji L; Ohnoutka C; Touhey D; Sauer M; Schweser KA; Kfuri M; Cook JL; Rocca GJD; Crist BD
Injury; 2023 Feb; 54(2):669-676. PubMed ID: 36539309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective randomized study comparing two cephalomedullary nails for elderly intertrochanteric fractures: Zimmer natural nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation II.
Shin YS; Chae JE; Kang TW; Han SB
Injury; 2017 Jul; 48(7):1550-1557. PubMed ID: 28433451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for cut-outs in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with cephalomedullary nailing after obtaining acceptable reduction: a case-control study.
Huang JW; Gao XS; Yang YF
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Apr; 23(1):354. PubMed ID: 35414068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk Factors Associated With Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures.
Ciufo DJ; Zaruta DA; Lipof JS; Judd KT; Gorczyca JT; Ketz JP
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Nov; 31(11):583-588. PubMed ID: 28827502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
