561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30885499)
21. Efficacy and Safety of "Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography" with Right Transradial Access versus Left Transradial Access and Femoral Access: a Retrospective Comparative Study.
Balaban Y; Akbaş MH; Akbaş ML; Özerdem A
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2019; 34(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30810674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cardiac Catheterizations in Patients With Prior Coronary Bypass Surgery: Impact of Access Strategy on Short-Term Safety and Long-Term Efficacy Outcomes.
Groenland FT; Wilschut JM; van den Oord SC; Kardys I; Diletti R; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; Daemen J; Van Mieghem NM; Dekker WKD
Angiology; 2021 May; 72(5):465-473. PubMed ID: 33464117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adoption of the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention and rates of vascular complications following transfemoral procedures: Insights from NCDR.
Badri M; Shapiro T; Wang Y; Minges KE; Curtis JP; Gray WA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(5):835-841. PubMed ID: 29359497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention of left main disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Ando T; Aoi S; Ashraf S; Villablanca PA; Telila T; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Afonso L; Grines CL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 94(2):264-273. PubMed ID: 30536799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transradial versus transfemoral ancillary approach in complex structural, coronary, and peripheral interventions. Results from the multicenter ancillary registry: A study of the Italian Radial Club.
Cortese B; Rigattieri S; Aranzulla TC; Russo F; Latib A; Burzotta F; Agostoni P; Ielasi A; Tarantino F; Sticchi A; Di Palma G; de Benedictis M; Trani C; Boccaletti R; Miccoli R; Valsecchi O; Colombo A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 91(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 28463463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography and interventions: 1-year outcomes after initiating the transradial approach in a cardiology training program.
Balwanz CR; Javed U; Singh GD; Armstrong EJ; Southard JA; Wong GB; Yeo KK; Low RI; Laird JR; Rogers JH
Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 23453098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral artery approach for percutaneous coronary angiography and angioplasty: a retrospective seven-year experience from a north Indian center.
Tewari S; Sharma N; Kapoor A; Syal SK; Kumar S; Garg N; Goel PK
Indian Heart J; 2013; 65(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 23992998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Strategies to overcome challenges of transradial coronary angiography and intervention.
Papadopoulos K; Kerner A; Yalonetsky S; Nikolsky E; Feld Y; Roguin A
Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2020 Dec; 21(4):501-505. PubMed ID: 33387994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.
Roule V; Lemaitre A; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Dahdouh Z; Berger L; Milliez P; Grollier G; Montalescot G; Beygui F
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Barriers to use of radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention.
Riangwiwat T; Mumtaz T; Blankenship JC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):268-273. PubMed ID: 31797564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Neurologic complications after transradial or transfemoral approach for diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization: A propensity score analysis of 16,710 cases from a single centre prospective registry.
Raposo L; Madeira S; Teles RC; Santos M; Gabriel HM; Gonçalves P; Brito J; Leal S; Almeida M; Mendes M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jul; 86(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 25676170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Left Distal Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A US Experience.
Al-Azizi KM; Grewal V; Gobeil K; Maqsood K; Haider A; Mohani A; Giugliano G; Lotfi AS
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep; 20(9):786-789. PubMed ID: 30413346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparisons of Clinical and Procedural Outcomes Between Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry).
Lim YH; Lee Y; Shin J; Yoon J; Lee SH; Rha SW; Lee JH; Jeong MH; Cho BR; Kim KS
Am J Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 117(8):1272-81. PubMed ID: 26899492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiographic evaluation in patients with internal mammary artery grafts.
Burzotta F; Trani C; Todaro D; Romagnoli E; Niccoli G; Ginnico F; Talarico GP; Tommasino A; Mazzari MA; Mongiardo R; Schiavoni G; Crea F
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Mar; 9(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 18301143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral access in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary lesions.
Koifman E; Gaglia MA; Escarcega RO; Bernardo NL; Lager RA; Gallino RA; Ben-Dor I; Pichard AD; Baker NC; Lipinski MJ; Kiramijyan S; Negi SI; Torguson R; Gai J; Suddath WO; Satler LF; Waksman R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):640-646. PubMed ID: 27860277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Increased Radial Access Is Not Associated With Worse Femoral Outcomes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United Kingdom.
Hulme W; Sperrin M; Kontopantelis E; Ratib K; Ludman P; Sirker A; Kinnaird T; Curzen N; Kwok CS; De Belder M; Nolan J; Mamas MA;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 10(2):e004279. PubMed ID: 28196898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.
Abdelaal E; Brousseau-Provencher C; Montminy S; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Bataille Y; Molin P; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Roy L; Larose É; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Proulx G; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1129-37. PubMed ID: 24139933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Experience and complications associated with use of guide extension catheters in percutaneous coronary intervention.
Waterbury TM; Sorajja P; Bell MR; Lennon RJ; Mathew V; Singh M; Sandhu GS; Gulati R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 88(7):1057-1065. PubMed ID: 26698371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
