These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30885584)
21. Accuracy of impression-making methods in edentulous arches: An in vitro study encompassing conventional and digital methods. Li J; Moon HS; Kim JH; Yoon HI; Oh KC J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 33583617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine. Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Digital Scans: Effect of Scanning Protocol, Number of Implants, and Scan Body Splinting. Denneulin T; Rignon-Bret C; Ravalec G; Tapie L; Bouter D; Wulfman C Int J Prosthodont; 2023 May; 36(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 36288490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces. Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104414. PubMed ID: 36640842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study. Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners. Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method. Nagy Z; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans Z; Renne W; Vág J BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32264943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Do "cut out-rescan" procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans? Reich S; Yatmaz B; Raith S J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 32059858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations. Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience. Revell G; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans ZP; Renne W; Ludlow M; Vág J J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):632-638. PubMed ID: 33832761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. Osman RB; Alharbi NM J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans. Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. Imburgia M; Logozzo S; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Mangano C; Mangano FG BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 28577366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Error propagation from intraoral scanning to additive manufacturing of complete-arch dentate models: An in vitro study. Auškalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevičius D; Simonaitis T; Rutkūnas V J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104136. PubMed ID: 35460866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of interdental spaces and the palate on the accuracy of maxillary scans acquired using different intraoral scanners. Akl MA; Daifallah K; Pérez-Barquero JA; Barmak AB; Wee AG; Revilla-León M J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):125-134. PubMed ID: 37591814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro evaluation of the impact of intraoral scanner, scanning aids, and the scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches. Jamjoom FZ; Aldghim A; Aldibasi O; Yilmaz B J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38953541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]