These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30886323)

  • 1. Prospectively reinstated memory drives conscious access of matching visual input.
    Gayet S; Moorselaar DV; Olivers CNL; Paffen CLE; Stigchel SV
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4793. PubMed ID: 30886323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No evidence for mnemonic modulation of interocularly suppressed visual input.
    Gayet S; Guggenmos M; Christophel TB; Haynes JD; Paffen CLE; Sterzer P; Van der Stigchel S
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116801. PubMed ID: 32276069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual Working Memory Enhances the Neural Response to Matching Visual Input.
    Gayet S; Guggenmos M; Christophel TB; Haynes JD; Paffen CLE; Van der Stigchel S; Sterzer P
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(28):6638-6647. PubMed ID: 28592696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information matching the content of visual working memory is prioritized for conscious access.
    Gayet S; Paffen CL; Van der Stigchel S
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2472-80. PubMed ID: 24121415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual input that matches the content of visual working memory requires less (not faster) evidence sampling to reach conscious access.
    Gayet S; van Maanen L; Heilbron M; Paffen CL; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2016 Sep; 16(11):26. PubMed ID: 27690166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. VWM-based bias in conscious access can be extended to a new sandwich masking task and real-life stimuli.
    Bao X; Lyu Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2123-2130. PubMed ID: 37226040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competitive interactions in visual working memory drive access to awareness.
    van Moorselaar D; Gayet S; Paffen CLE; Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S; Olivers CNL
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():6-13. PubMed ID: 28483160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tuning perception: Visual working memory biases the quality of visual awareness.
    Salahub CM; Emrich SM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1854-1859. PubMed ID: 27206649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection.
    Kerzel D; Andres MK
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104158. PubMed ID: 31986352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How retaining objects containing multiple features in visual working memory regulates the priority for access to visual awareness.
    Ding Y; Naber M; Paffen C; Gayet S; Van der Stigchel S
    Conscious Cogn; 2021 Jan; 87():103057. PubMed ID: 33307426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hide and seek: Directing top-down attention is not sufficient for accelerating conscious access.
    Gayet S; Douw I; van der Burg V; Van der Stigchel S; Paffen CLE
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():235-252. PubMed ID: 30274667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The priority for access to awareness of information matching VWM is mirror-invariant.
    Ding Y; Naber M; Paffen C; Sahakian A; Van der Stigchel S
    Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104463. PubMed ID: 33035797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object maintenance beyond their visible parts in working memory.
    Chen S; Töllner T; Müller HJ; Conci M
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Jan; 119(1):347-355. PubMed ID: 29070629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual working memory and saliency independently influence the priority for access to visual awareness.
    Ding Y; Paffen CLE; Naber M; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2019 Sep; 19(11):9. PubMed ID: 31532471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual working memory representations bias attention more when they are the target of an action plan.
    Trentin C; Slagter HA; Olivers CNL
    Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105274. PubMed ID: 36113256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.