211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30887120)
1. Reliability of the commonly used classification systems for interprosthetic fractures.
Jennison T; Jawed A; ElBakoury A; Hosny H; Yarlagadda R
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Jul; 29(5):1069-1072. PubMed ID: 30887120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures treated with polyaxial locking plates.
Hoffmann MF; Lotzien S; Schildhauer TA
Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):934-8. PubMed ID: 26792022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.
Naqvi GA; Baig SA; Awan N
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1047-50. PubMed ID: 22425302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Management of Interprosthetic Femur Fractures.
Scolaro JA; Schwarzkopf R
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2017 Apr; 25(4):e63-e69. PubMed ID: 28252475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System for postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished taper-slip stems.
Jain S; Mohrir G; Townsend O; Lamb JN; Palan J; Aderinto J; Pandit H
Bone Joint J; 2021 Aug; 103-B(8):1339-1344. PubMed ID: 34334039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and Validity of the Vancouver Classification in Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cementless Femoral Stems.
Lee S; Kagan R; Wang L; Doung YC
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S277-S281. PubMed ID: 30922672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.
Huang JF; Chen JJ; Shen JJ; Du WX; Liu FC; Tong PJ
Acta Orthop Belg; 2016 Aug; 82(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 27682284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management and outcome of interprosthetic femoral fractures.
Platzer P; Schuster R; Luxl M; Widhalm HK; Eipeldauer S; Krusche-Mandl I; Ostermann R; Blutsch B; Vécsei V
Injury; 2011 Nov; 42(11):1219-25. PubMed ID: 21176899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interprosthetic femoral fractures: analysis of 14 cases. Proposal for an additional grade in the Vancouver and SoFCOT classifications.
Soenen M; Migaud H; Bonnomet F; Girard J; Mathevon H; Ehlinger M
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Nov; 97(7):693-8. PubMed ID: 21982823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence of and risk factors for femoral fractures in the gap between hip and knee implants.
Valle Cruz JA; Urda AL; Serrano L; Rodriguez-Gonzalez FA; Otero J; Moro E; López-Durán L
Int Orthop; 2016 Aug; 40(8):1697-1702. PubMed ID: 26338344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of interprosthetic fractures of the femur.
Hou Z; Moore B; Bowen TR; Irgit K; Matzko ME; Strohecker KA; Smith WR
J Trauma; 2011 Dec; 71(6):1715-9. PubMed ID: 22182879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraobserver Reliability and Interobserver Agreement in Radiographic Classification of Heterotopic Ossification.
Vasileiadis GI; Itoigawa Y; Amanatullah DF; Pulido-Sierra L; Crenshaw JR; Huyber C; Taunton MJ; Kaufman KR
Orthopedics; 2017 Jan; 40(1):e54-e58. PubMed ID: 27684082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome of surgical treatment of inter prosthetic fractures: A case series.
Jennison T; Yarlagadda R
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Jun; 105(4):587-589. PubMed ID: 30745036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Periprosthetic humerus fractures after shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of available classification systems.
Kuhn MZ; King JJ; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Levy JC; Hao KA; Wallace A; Patrick M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2034-2042. PubMed ID: 35562034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.
Glen LZQ; Wong JYS; Tay WX; Li TP; Phua SKA; Manohara R; Chee YH
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023; 62(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 36690511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Higher reliability and validity of Baba classification with computerised tomography imaging and implant information for periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Baba T; Homma Y; Ochi H; Kobayashi H; Matsumoto M; Sakamoto Y; Kuwahara H; Maeda K; Kaneko K
Int Orthop; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1695-9. PubMed ID: 25603973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of Current Classification Systems for Periprosthetic Fractures of the Humerus.
Auran RL; Tran TL; Dehghan N; McKee MD; Lederman ES
J Orthop Trauma; 2023 Feb; 37(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 36155598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reliability and validity of the modified Unified Classification System for periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.
Fan MQ; Fan XH; Chen XL; Shen JJ; Jiang XJ; Li XS; Huang JF
J Orthop Sci; 2021 May; 26(3):385-388. PubMed ID: 32229162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
