These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30887120)

  • 41. Interprosthetic femoral fractures: Morbidity and mortality in a retrospective, multicenter study.
    Bonnevialle P; Marcheix PS; Nicolau X; Arboucalot M; Lebaron M; Chantelot C; Mainard D; Ehlinger M;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Jun; 105(4):579-585. PubMed ID: 30514624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Baba classification focused on implant designs is useful in setting the therapeutic strategy for interprosthetic femoral fracture.
    Baba T; Kaneko K; Homma Y; Ochi H; Ozaki Y; Watari T; Matsumoto M
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):247-254. PubMed ID: 28956171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Crowe and Hartofilakidis classifications in the assessment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in adult patients.
    Kose O; Celiktas M; Guler F; Baz AB; Togrul E; Akalin S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Nov; 132(11):1625-30. PubMed ID: 22886171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Validation of a new classification system for interprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Pires RES; Silveira MPS; Resende ARDS; Junior EOS; Campos TVO; Santos LEN; Balbachevsky D; Andrade MAP
    Injury; 2017 Jul; 48(7):1388-1392. PubMed ID: 28456366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability assessment of calcaneal fracture classification systems.
    Howells NR; Hughes AW; Jackson M; Atkins RM; Livingstone JA
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2014; 53(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23993039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Inter- and intraobserver agreement of three classification systems for lateral clavicle fractures - reliability comparison between two specialist groups.
    Rauer T; Boos M; Neuhaus V; Ellanti P; Kaufmann RA; Pape HC; Allemann F
    Patient Saf Surg; 2020; 14():4. PubMed ID: 31911821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.
    Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures.
    Duncan CP; Haddad FS
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):713-6. PubMed ID: 24891568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
    Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ankle Fracture Classification: An Innovative System for Describing Ankle Fractures.
    Briet JP; Hietbrink F; Smeeing DP; Dijkgraaf MGW; Verleisdonk EJ; Houwert RM
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 May; 58(3):492-496. PubMed ID: 30795890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A proposed classification of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasties.
    Su ET; Kubiak EN; Dewal H; Hiebert R; Di Cesare PE
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):405-8. PubMed ID: 16627150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A retrospective evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification and Fernandez classification for distal radius fracture.
    Yinjie Y; Gen W; Hongbo W; Chongqing X; Fan Z; Yanqi F; Xuequn W; Wen M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(2):e18508. PubMed ID: 31914022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Classifications in Brief: Pires Classification of Interprosthetic Femur Fractures.
    Gheewala RA; Young JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Sep; 480(9):1666-1671. PubMed ID: 35616481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Small interprosthetic gaps do not increase femoral peri-prosthetic fracture risk. An in vitro biomechanical analysis.
    Quirynen T; Corten K; Segal O; Simon JP; Vander Sloten J; van Lenthe HG
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2017 Jun; 83(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 30399982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Interposition sleeve as treatment option for interprosthetic fractures of the femur: a biomechanical in vitro assessment.
    Weiser L; Korecki MA; Sellenschloh K; Fensky F; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Rueger JM; Lehmann W
    Int Orthop; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1743-7. PubMed ID: 25913266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the King, Lenke, and PUMC classification systems for idiopathic scoliosis].
    Sheng WB; Zheng XF; Guo HL; Zhan YL; Mai ED; Jin GL; Pu LT; Sheng J; Deng Q
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 89(15):1047-52. PubMed ID: 19595255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. New fracture pattern focusing on implant fracture for periprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Huang JF; Shen JJ; Chen JJ; Zheng Y; Du WX; Liu FC; Tong PJ
    Int Orthop; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1765-9. PubMed ID: 26105767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reliability of the Anterior Humeral Line Index Compared With the Gartland Classification for Posteriorly Hinged Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.
    Murphy-Zane MS; Pyle L
    Orthopedics; 2018 Jul; 41(4):e502-e505. PubMed ID: 29708571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
    Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.