These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30887382)

  • 41. Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.
    Grant S; Conway ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1239-1255. PubMed ID: 30850853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The visual and driving performance of monocular and binocular heavy-duty truck drivers.
    McKnight AJ; Shinar D; Hilburn B
    Accid Anal Prev; 1991 Aug; 23(4):225-37. PubMed ID: 1883464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Makino Y; Yano M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A new stereotest: the double two rod test.
    Fan WC; Brown B; Yap MK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 May; 16(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 8977882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
    Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Are blur and disparity complementary cues to depth?
    Langer MS; Siciliano RA
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():15-21. PubMed ID: 25482222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A computational theory of da Vinci stereopsis.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24914063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Binocular alignment in different depth planes.
    Erkelens CJ; Muijs AJ; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 1996 Jul; 36(14):2141-7. PubMed ID: 8776480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of brief monocular deprivation on binocular depth perception in the cat: a sensitive period for the loss of stereopsis.
    Timney B
    Vis Neurosci; 1990 Sep; 5(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 2134850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Perceived direction during monocular viewing is based on signals of the viewing eye only.
    Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(18):2411-9. PubMed ID: 10915882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Depth interval estimates from motion parallax and binocular disparity beyond interaction space.
    Gillam B; Palmisano SA; Govan DG
    Perception; 2011; 40(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 21513183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Color constrains depth in da Vinci stereopsis for camouflage but not occlusion.
    Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1525-40. PubMed ID: 23565743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of image position on the Independent Components of natural binocular images.
    Hunter DW; Hibbard PB
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):449. PubMed ID: 29323133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems.
    Servos P
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 130(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 10638439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information.
    Bradshaw MF; Parton AD; Glennerster A
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(27):3725-34. PubMed ID: 11090665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Decline of monocular contrast sensitivity during binocular fixation].
    Kozawa R; Bingushi K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2013 Feb; 83(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 23534261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Stereoscopic 3D geometric distortions analyzed from the viewer's point of view.
    Gao Z; Zhai G; Yang X
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240661. PubMed ID: 33057363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Neural correlates of monocular and binocular depth cues based on natural images: a LORETA analysis.
    Fischmeister FP; Bauer H
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3373-80. PubMed ID: 16828836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Stereoscopic correspondence for ambiguous targets is affected by elevation and fixation distance.
    Hibbard PB; Bouzit S
    Spat Vis; 2005; 18(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 16167773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis.
    Grove PM; Brooks KR; Anderson BL; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):3042-53. PubMed ID: 16986219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.