These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30887382)

  • 61. Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis.
    Grove PM; Brooks KR; Anderson BL; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1695-705; discussion 1706. PubMed ID: 16009392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Monocular Versus Binocular Calibrations in Evaluating Fixation Disparity With a Video-Based Eye-Tracker.
    Švede A; Treija E; Jaschinski W; Krūmiņa G
    Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):1110-28. PubMed ID: 26562925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The contribution of stereopsis in Emmert's law.
    Millard AS; Sperandio I; Chouinard PA
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Apr; 238(4):1061-1072. PubMed ID: 32215670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Interhemispheric depth judgement.
    Rivest J; Cavanagh P; Lassonde M
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Jan; 32(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 8818155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Contribution of disparity to the perception of 3D shape as revealed by bistability of stereoscopic Necker cubes.
    Erkelens CJ
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(6):561-76. PubMed ID: 23550365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Temporal dependencies in resolving monocular and binocular cue conflict in slant perception.
    Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(14):1869-85. PubMed ID: 10837832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Stereo correspondence is optimized for large viewing distances.
    Phillipson GP; Read JC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 32(11):1959-69. PubMed ID: 20955471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Peripheral fading with monocular and binocular viewing.
    González EG; Weinstock M; Steinbach MJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 17081583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Using a dichoptic moving window presentation technique to investigate binocular advantages during reading.
    Nikolova M; Jainta S; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):265-280. PubMed ID: 27819454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Fixation patterns in maculopathy: from binocular to monocular viewing.
    Tarita-Nistor L; Brent MH; Steinbach MJ; González EG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 89(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 22266814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping.
    Marotta JJ; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Aug; 121(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 9746154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Monocular transparency generates quantitative depth.
    Howard IP; Duke PA
    Vision Res; 2003 Nov; 43(25):2615-21. PubMed ID: 14552803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Perceptual integration across natural monocular regions.
    Zeiner KM; Spitschan M; Harris JM
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):5. PubMed ID: 24599943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Perception of scene-relative object movement: Optic flow parsing and the contribution of monocular depth cues.
    Warren PA; Rushton SK
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1406-19. PubMed ID: 19480063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Stereomotion perception for a monocularly camouflaged stimulus.
    Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
    J Vis; 2007 Oct; 7(13):1.1-14. PubMed ID: 17997629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Spatial perception in normal and strabismic subjects: role of stereopsis and monocular clues.
    Nuzzi G; Cantù C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 13(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 12948307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Contour integration across depth.
    Hess RF; Field DJ
    Vision Res; 1995 Jun; 35(12):1699-711. PubMed ID: 7660578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Prehension of a Flanked Target in Individuals With Amblyopia.
    Buckley JG; Pacey IE; Panesar GK; Scally A; Barrett BT
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 56(12):7568-80. PubMed ID: 26618649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Compression of perceived depth as a function of viewing conditions.
    Nolan A; Delshad R; Sedgwick HA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1757-67. PubMed ID: 23160438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.