These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30887584)

  • 1. Microtargeting for conservation.
    Metcalf AL; Phelan CN; Pallai C; Norton M; Yuhas B; Finley JC; Muth A
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1141-1150. PubMed ID: 30887584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
    Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans for species at risk across gradients of agricultural land use.
    Robillard CM; Kerr JT
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):837-847. PubMed ID: 27991681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating complementary networks of restoration plantings for landscape-scale occurrence of temporally dynamic species.
    Ikin K; Tulloch A; Gibbons P; Ansell D; Seddon J; Lindenmayer D
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1027-37. PubMed ID: 27040452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of preference heterogeneity among landowners on spatial conservation prioritization.
    Nielsen ASE; Strange N; Bruun HH; Jacobsen JB
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 27995662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving inferences about private land conservation by accounting for incomplete reporting.
    Williamson MA; Dickson BG; Hooten MB; Graves RA; Lubell MN; Schwartz MW
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1174-1185. PubMed ID: 33319392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accounting for spatial heterogeneity in the added conservation value of land protection when prioritizing protected areas.
    Yoon HS; Vijay V; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13960. PubMed ID: 35661264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
    Sutton NJ; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding variation in impacts from private protected areas across regions and protection mechanisms to inform organizational practices.
    Hagen S; Nolte C; Chang Y; Morgan S; Boccaletti G; Reddy SMW
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14225. PubMed ID: 38328897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas.
    Karimi A; Tulloch AIT; Brown G; Hockings M
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 28425128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How decisions about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes.
    Muscatello A; Elith J; Kujala H
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1309-1320. PubMed ID: 33236808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving effectiveness of systematic conservation planning with density data.
    Veloz S; Salas L; Altman B; Alexander J; Jongsomjit D; Elliott N; Ballard G
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1217-1227. PubMed ID: 25873240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of conservation easements in agricultural regions.
    Braza M
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):848-859. PubMed ID: 28218793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping legal authority for terrestrial conservation corridors along streams.
    Stahl AT; Fremier AK; Cosens BA
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Aug; 34(4):943-955. PubMed ID: 32056252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representation of critical natural capital in China.
    Lü Y; Zhang L; Zeng Y; Fu B; Whitham C; Liu S; Wu B
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 28218967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current practice and future prospects for social data in coastal and ocean planning.
    Le Cornu E; Kittinger JN; Koehn JZ; Finkbeiner EM; Crowder LB
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):902-11. PubMed ID: 24779578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conservation planning on China's borders with Myanmar, Laos, and Vietnam.
    Wang L; Yang B; Bai Y; Lu X; Corlett RT; Tan Y; Chen XY; Zhu J; Liu Y; Quan RC
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1797-1808. PubMed ID: 33749881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic and ecological outcomes of flexible biodiversity offset systems.
    Habib TJ; Farr DR; Schneider RR; Boutin S
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 23869724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country.
    Tobón W; Urquiza-Haas T; Koleff P; Schröter M; Ortega-Álvarez R; Campo J; Lindig-Cisneros R; Sarukhán J; Bonn A
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1086-1097. PubMed ID: 28233917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.