165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30887806)
1. Evidence, Determination, and Implications of Membrane-Independent Limiting Flux in Forward Osmosis Systems.
Morrow CP; Childress AE
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Apr; 53(8):4380-4388. PubMed ID: 30887806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the Limitations of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis: Membrane Fouling and the Limiting Flux.
Peters CD; Li D; Mo Z; Hankins NP; She Q
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 May; 56(10):6678-6688. PubMed ID: 35475365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon.
Lay WC; Chong TH; Tang CY; Fane AG; Zhang J; Liu Y
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 20182071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Highly permeable double-skinned forward osmosis membranes for anti-fouling in the emulsified oil-water separation process.
Duong PH; Chung TS; Wei S; Irish L
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 24621207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fouling propensity of novel TFC membranes with different osmotic and hydraulic pressure driving forces.
Sauchelli Toran M; D'Haese A; Rodríguez-Roda I; Gernjak W
Water Res; 2020 May; 175():115657. PubMed ID: 32151816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fouling distribution in forward osmosis membrane process.
Lee J; Kim B; Hong S
J Environ Sci (China); 2014 Jun; 26(6):1348-54. PubMed ID: 25079847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fabrication and performance of PET mesh enhanced cellulose acetate membranes for forward osmosis.
Li G; Wang J; Hou D; Bai Y; Liu H
J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Jul; 45():7-17. PubMed ID: 27372114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biofouling in forward osmosis systems: An experimental and numerical study.
Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; Vrouwenvelder JS; Picioreanu C
Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():86-97. PubMed ID: 27697688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes.
She Q; Jin X; Li Q; Tang CY
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2478-86. PubMed ID: 22386887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly.
Saren Q; Qiu CQ; Tang CY
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(12):5201-8. PubMed ID: 21591607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polyoxometalate based thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane: Superhydrophilic, anti-fouling, and high water permeable.
Shakeri A; Salehi H; Ghorbani F; Amini M; Naslhajian H
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2019 Feb; 536():328-338. PubMed ID: 30380432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental study of water and salt fluxes through reverse osmosis membranes.
Zhou W; Song L
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 May; 39(9):3382-7. PubMed ID: 15926593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis.
Yip NY; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(23):10273-82. PubMed ID: 22022858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of natural organic matter fouling and osmotic backwash on pressure retarded osmosis energy production from natural salinity gradients.
Yip NY; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2013; 47(21):12607-16. PubMed ID: 24099133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes.
Coday BD; Heil DM; Xu P; Cath TY
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(5):2386-93. PubMed ID: 23363015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploration of an innovative draw solution for a forward osmosis-membrane distillation desalination process.
Nguyen NC; Chen SS; Jain S; Nguyen HT; Ray SS; Ngo HH; Guo W; Lam NT; Duong HC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(6):5203-5211. PubMed ID: 28527139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of tannic acid on membrane fouling and membrane cleaning in forward osmosis.
Zhang W; Wang L; Dong B
Water Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 76(11-12):3160-3170. PubMed ID: 29210702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Membrane fouling and anti-fouling strategies using RO retentate from a municipal water recycling plant as the feed for osmotic power generation.
Chen SC; Amy GL; Chung TS
Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():144-155. PubMed ID: 26492341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients.
Yip NY; Tiraferri A; Phillip WA; Schiffman JD; Hoover LA; Kim YC; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 May; 45(10):4360-9. PubMed ID: 21491936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
